K.S.A. » Chapter 60
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 60-3801 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-3801.

History: L. 1988, ch. 222, § 1; Repealed, L. 2014, ch. 84, § 6; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1990–1994 · leading case: Thompson v. KFB Ins., 850 P.2d 773 (Kan. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Thompson v. KFB Ins., 850 P.2d 773 (Kan. 1993). · cites it 5× “Before trial began, the district court ruled that K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 60-3801 et seq., the current Collateral Source Benefits Act, is unconstitutional.”
Gregory v. Carey, 791 P.2d 1329 (Kan. 1990). · cites it 6× “K.S.A. 1989 Supp. 60-3807. Since Marquette was injured on October 28, 1985, K.”
Kerns Ex Rel. Kerns v. G.A.C., Inc., 875 P.2d 949 (Kan. 1994). · cites it 4× “*276 EVIDENCE OF COLLATERAL SOURCE BENEFITS Plaintiff challenged the constitutionality of K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 60-3801 et seq., the Collateral Source Benefits Act, prior to trial.”
Cott v. Peppermint Twist Mgmt. Co., 856 P.2d 906 (Kan. 1993). “COLLATERAL SOURCE BENEFITS Peppermint Twist argued the trial court erred in failing to apply the Collateral Source Benefits Act, K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 60-3801 et seq., and in not allowing the nightclub to introduce evidence of the Cotts’ settlements with Ecolab.”
Masterson v. Boliden-Allis, Inc., 865 P.2d 1031 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993). “2d 773 (1993); K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 60-3801 et seq. Defendant argues the collateral source rule is generally not applicable in breach of contract cases and ux-ges this court not to inject tort theories of recovery into a contract case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.