K.S.A. » Chapter 60
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 60-513a (2026)

Ionizing radiation defined

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-513a. Ionizing radiation defined. For purposes of this act, "ionizing radiation" means any particulate or electromagnetic radiation capable of producing ions directly or indirectly in its passage through matter.

History: L. 1968, ch. 6, § 2; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Patient allegation that he did not have actual notice of claim until purchasing medical records survives motion to dismiss. Asselin v. Shawnee Mission Medical Center, Inc., 903 F. Supp. 1454, 1456 (1995).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1982–2015 · leading case: Bonin v. Vannaman, 929 P.2d 754 (Kan. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bonin v. Vannaman, 929 P.2d 754 (Kan. 1996). “(See K.S.A. 1970 Supp. 60-513a, 60-513b and 60-513c.”
Hallam v. Mercy Health Ctr. of Manhattan, Inc., 97 P.3d 492 (Kan. 2004). “(6) An action to recover for an ionizing radiation injury as provided in K.S.A. 60-513a, 60-513b and 60-513c, and amendments thereto.”
Brubaker Ex Rel. Brubaker v. Cavanaugh, 542 F. Supp. 944 (D. Kan. 1982). “(See K.S.A. 1970 Supp. 60-513a, 60-513b and 60-513c.”
P.W.P. v. L.S., 969 P.2d 896 (Kan. 1998). “We first stated in Hecht that while the doctrine of continuous treatment in a patient-physician situation had support in other jurisdictions, it was not applicable in Kansas: “The Kansas legislature preempted policy making on the subject by enacting in 1963 the additional…”
in Re CVR Energy, INC. & CVR Refining, LP (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 3× “(6) An action to recover for an ionizing radiation injury as provided in K.S.A. 60-513a, 60-513b and 60-513c, and amendments thereto.”
in Re CVR Energy, INC. & CVR Refining, LP (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “Introduction to the statement of facts. Donald and Jennifer Collier are married and live in Independence, Kansas (App.”
Pwp v. Ls, 969 P.2d 896 (Kan. 1998). “We first stated in Hecht that while the doctrine of continuous treatment in a patient-physician situation had support in other jurisdictions, it was not applicable in Kansas: "The Kansas legislature preempted policy making on the subject by enacting in 1963 the additional…”
— K.S.A. § 60-513a(4) — 2 cases
in Re CVR Energy, INC. & CVR Refining, LP (Tex. App. 2015). “(6) An action to recover for an ionizing radiation injury as provided in K.S.A. 60-513a, 60-513b and 60-513c, and amendments thereto.”
in Re CVR Energy, INC. & CVR Refining, LP (Tex. App. 2015). “Introduction to the statement of facts. Donald and Jennifer Collier are married and live in Independence, Kansas (App.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.