History:
L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-715; L. 1970, ch. 238, § 6; L. 1979, ch. 183, § 2; Repealed, L. 2002, ch. 198, § 19; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Referred to in holding K.S.A. 60-213 inapplicable to cross claims where such claims never coexisted, Waechter v. Amoco Production Co., 217 Kan. 489, 518, 537 P.2d 228.
2. Applied; order initiated under K.S.A. 23-496 held final decision under K.S.A. 60-2102(a)(4); wage garnishment for past due child support. Brown v. Tubbs, 2 Kan. App. 2d 522, 524, 582 P.2d 1165.
3. Child support obligor failed to state wrongful garnishment claim. Vanover v. Cook, 260 F.3d 1182, 1188 (2001).
Vanover v. Cook, 260 F.3d 1182 (10th Cir. 2001). “See Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-715 . Thus, it would appear that Kansas law contemplates garnishments may be sought as a matter of course before liability is determined.”
Christenson v. Akin, 326 P.2d 313 (Kan. 1958). · cites it 2דIn view of the provisions of section 60-715, supra, we feel that the trial court should give the contract that reasonable construction, and allow the parties a further hearing upon the question of past damages suffered by defendants because of the acts of plaintiffs in violation…”
Brown v. Tubbs, 582 P.2d 1165 (Kan. Ct. App. 1978). “Similarly, K.S.A. 60-715 provides that, where garnishment proceedings affect the earnings of the defendant, they shall not be commenced before judgment on plaintiff’s claim in the principal action.”
In Re Stanley Station Assocs., L.P., 139 B.R. 990 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1992). “K.S.A. 60-715. Replevin, under K.S.A. 60-1005, and foreclosure of security interest, under K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.