Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 61-1803 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
61-1803.
History: L. 1969, ch. 290, § 61-1803; L. 1976, ch. 258, § 24; L. 1977, ch. 112, § 32; L. 1982, ch. 244, § 2; L. 1986, ch. 215, § 20; L. 1990, ch. 202, § 18; L. 1992, ch. 290, § 3; L. 2000, ch. 175, § 9; Repealed, L. 2001, ch. 211, § 18; July 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2022 · leading case: In Re Crosby, 261 B.R. 470 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2001).
In Re Crosby, 261 B.R. 470 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2001). “Petersen, K.S.A. 61-1803(c)(1) authorizes service of process to be made “by leaving a copy of the process and petition .”
In Re Marriage of Welliver, 869 P.2d 653 (Kan. 1994). “He also notes that while the appendix to Chapter 60 does not contain any official forms for a motion to appoint a special process server, the appendix to Chapter 61, limited actions, does contain a form for K.S.A. 61-1803(c)(3) which has language identical to 60-303(c)(3)…”
In re B.K.J., 9 P.3d 586 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “K.S.A. 61-1803(b). It does not require the endorsements “return receipt requested showing address where delivered” and “deliver to addressee only.”
In Re Bkj, 9 P.3d 586 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “K.S.A. 61-1803(b). It does not require the endorsements "return receipt requested showing address where delivered" and "deliver to addressee only.”
In re A.P. (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). “) K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 61-1803(b). We thus concluded that "[s]ervice of process by restricted mail is different from service by certified mail.”
— K.S.A. § 61-1803(b) — 3 cases
In re B.K.J., 9 P.3d 586 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “K.S.A. 61-1803(b). It does not require the endorsements “return receipt requested showing address where delivered” and “deliver to addressee only.”
In Re Bkj, 9 P.3d 586 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “K.S.A. 61-1803(b). It does not require the endorsements "return receipt requested showing address where delivered" and "deliver to addressee only.”
In re A.P. (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). “) K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 61-1803(b). We thus concluded that "[s]ervice of process by restricted mail is different from service by certified mail.”
— K.S.A. § 61-1803(c)(1) — 1 case
In Re Crosby, 261 B.R. 470 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2001). “Petersen, K.S.A. 61-1803(c)(1) authorizes service of process to be made “by leaving a copy of the process and petition .”
— K.S.A. § 61-1803(c)(3) — 1 case
In Re Marriage of Welliver, 869 P.2d 653 (Kan. 1994). “He also notes that while the appendix to Chapter 60 does not contain any official forms for a motion to appoint a special process server, the appendix to Chapter 61, limited actions, does contain a form for K.S.A. 61-1803(c)(3) which has language identical to 60-303(c)(3)…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.