K.S.A. » Chapter 61
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 61-2005 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

61-2005.

History: L. 1969, ch. 290, § 61-2005; L. 1970, ch. 238, § 10; L. 1972, ch. 222, § 6; L. 1978, ch. 227, § 6; L. 1983, ch. 198, § 3; L. 1988, ch. 212, § 4; L. 1988, ch. 213, § 4; L. 1994, ch. 273, § 6; Repealed, L. 2000, ch. 161, § 117; January 1, 2001.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1981–2020 · leading case: In Re Pulliam, 262 B.R. 539 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Pulliam, 262 B.R. 539 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2001). · cites it 2× “See Kan. Stat. Ann. § 61-2005 (c) (1999). This is precisely the “continuation” of process stayed by § 362(a).”
Schwerdt, Grace & Niemackl v. Speedway Festivals, Inc., 637 P.2d 477 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981). “K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 61-2005(c) provides in pertinent part: “An order of garnishment .”
Curiel v. Quinn, 832 P.2d 1206 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992). “The order of garnishment was issued pursuant to K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 61-2005(c), which states that an order of garnishment has the effect of attaching all such personal property of the defendant in the possession or control of the garnishee *128 and all such credits and…”
Stormont-Vail Healthcare v. Sievers (Kan. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 4× “60-717 15 (attachment and garnishment in regular actions) and K.S.A. 61-2005 (attachment and garnishment in limited action proceedings).”
— K.S.A. § 61-2005(c) — 3 cases
Schwerdt, Grace & Niemackl v. Speedway Festivals, Inc., 637 P.2d 477 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981). “K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 61-2005(c) provides in pertinent part: “An order of garnishment .”
Curiel v. Quinn, 832 P.2d 1206 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992). “The order of garnishment was issued pursuant to K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 61-2005(c), which states that an order of garnishment has the effect of attaching all such personal property of the defendant in the possession or control of the garnishee *128 and all such credits and…”
Stormont-Vail Healthcare v. Sievers (Kan. Ct. App. 2020). “60-717 15 (attachment and garnishment in regular actions) and K.S.A. 61-2005 (attachment and garnishment in limited action proceedings).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.