History:
L. 1957, ch. 338, § 17; Repealed, L. 1972, ch. 234, § 41; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Cited; duty of accused and prosecution under section discussed. State v. Braun, 209 Kan. 181, 189, 495 P.2d 1000.
2. Cited; conviction under K.S.A. 65-2602 upheld; state need not prove defendant was not an exempted person. State v. Brothers, 212 Kan. 187, 190, 510 P.2d 608.
3. Provisions making it unnecessary to negate exceptions to prohibitions in narcotic drug act, not unconstitutional. State v. Carter, 214 Kan. 533, 535, 536, 521 P.2d 294.
State v. Gunn, 26 P.3d 710 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “65-2517 (Corrick), which read as follows: “In any complaint, information, or indictment, and in any action or proceeding brought for the enforcement of any provision of this act, it shall not be necessary to negative [sic] any exception, excuse, proviso, or exemption contained…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.