K.S.A. » Chapter 65
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 65-4801 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

65-4801.

History: L. 1976, ch. 280, § 1; L. 1977, ch. 224, § 1; L. 1978, ch. 260, § 1; L. 1978, ch. 261, § 1; L. 1979, ch. 191, § 1; L. 1980, ch. 197, § 1; L. 1982, ch. 272, § 1; L. 1983, ch. 219, § 1; Repealed, L. 1997, ch. 16, § 1; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Statewide health coordinating council is review agency for issuance of certificates of need, unless governor designates another pursuant to subsection (f) of K.S.A. 65-4801; state corporation commission so designated by Executive Order 78-35. Suburban Medical Center v. Olathe Community Hosp., 226 Kan. 320, 332, 597 P.2d 654.

2. Statewide health coordinating council reviewing certificate of need for health facilities is performing quasi-judicial function; fairness requirements specified. Suburban Medical Center v. Olathe Community Hosp., 226 Kan. 320, 321, 322, 332, 597 P.2d 654.

3. Certificate of need under this article necessary to meet requirements of K.S.A. 19-18,128; certificate from regional planning agency insufficient. Pratt v. Board of Thomas County Comm'rs, 226 Kan. 333, 340, 341, 342, 597 P.2d 664.

4. Judicial review under act is of K.C.C. order, not K.D.H.E. order. In re Bethany Medical Center, 230 Kan. 201, 203, 206, 630 P.2d 1136 (1981).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1979–1984 · leading case: Suburban Med. Ctr. v. Olathe Cmty. Hosp., 597 P.2d 654 (Kan. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Suburban Med. Ctr. v. Olathe Cmty. Hosp., 597 P.2d 654 (Kan. 1979). · cites it 4× “All proceedings herein arise from the Health Facilities Act, K.S.A. 1976 Supp. 65-4801 et seq. Before proceeding to the facts of the case, it would be helpful to identify the various entities involved: 1.”
Excepticon Midwest, Inc. v. Kansas Dep't of Health & Env't, 676 P.2d 107 (Kan. 1984). · cites it 3× “This appeal involves the certificate of need provision of the Health Facilities Act, K.S.A. 65-4801 et seq. Under the Act any person undertaking to construct a new hospital to be licensed under the Kansas health laws must first secure a certificate of need.”
Olathe Cmty. Hosp. v. Kansas Corp. Comm'n, 652 P.2d 726 (Kan. 1982). · cites it 4× “Environment (KDHE) granting the petitioner’s request for a certificate of need pursuant to K.S.A. 65-4801 et seq. This court assumed jurisdiction by an order entered August 30, 1982.”
Pratt v. Bd. of Thomas Cnty. Comm'rs, 597 P.2d 664 (Kan. 1979). · cites it 8× “In response to the new federal *340 legislation, the 1976 Kansas legislature enacted K.S.A. 65-4801 et seq., pertaining to health facilities within the state.”
State Ex Rel. Metzler v. St. Francis Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 605 P.2d 100 (Kan. 1980). · cites it 4× “Francis Hospital from implementing an open heart surgery unit without first obtaining a certificate of need, which the Secretary alleged was required under the provisions of K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 65-4801 et seq. The United States Congress, in 1974, enacted the National Health…”
State ex rel. Metzler v. Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health Servs. Corp., 605 P.2d 100 (Kan. 1980). · cites it 4× “Francis Hospital from implementing an open heart surgery unit without first obtaining a certificate of need, which the Secretary alleged was required under the provisions of K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 65-4801 et seq. The United States Congress, in 1974, enacted the National Health…”
In re the Review of the Decision of the Kansas Corp. Comm'n Granting a Certificate of Need to Providence-St. Margaret Health Ctr., 659 P.2d 199 (Kan. 1983). · cites it 2× “) The trial court was in error in considering findings supplied by implication.”
In Re the Certificate of Need Application by the Bethany Med. Ctr. for a Six (6) Megavoltage Linear Accelerator, 630 P.2d 1136 (Kan. 1981). · cites it 3× “The KDHE now seeks to have the district court’s decision affirming the KCC’s order that directs the KDHE to issue a certificate of need reversed.”
Shawnee Mission Med. Ctr. v. Kansas Dep't of Health & Env't, 685 P.2d 880 (Kan. 1984). · cites it 2× “) application #4-JO-062 with KDHE in accordance with K.S.A. 65-4801 et seq. The Medical Center sought approval to construct a “free-standing” Alcoholism Recovery Unit (A.”
Shawnee Mission Med. Ctr. v. KAN DEPT OF HEALTH & ENV'T, 685 P.2d 880 (Kan. 1984). · cites it 2× “) application #4-JO-062 with KDHE in accordance with K.S.A. 65-4801 et seq. The Medical Center sought approval to construct a "free-standing" Alcoholism Recovery Unit (A.”
— K.S.A. § 65-4801(J) — 1 case
Suburban Med. Ctr. v. Olathe Cmty. Hosp., 597 P.2d 654 (Kan. 1979). “All proceedings herein arise from the Health Facilities Act, K.S.A. 1976 Supp. 65-4801 et seq. Before proceeding to the facts of the case, it would be helpful to identify the various entities involved: 1.”
— K.S.A. § 65-4801(c) — 2 cases
Suburban Med. Ctr. v. Olathe Cmty. Hosp., 597 P.2d 654 (Kan. 1979). “All proceedings herein arise from the Health Facilities Act, K.S.A. 1976 Supp. 65-4801 et seq. Before proceeding to the facts of the case, it would be helpful to identify the various entities involved: 1.”
In Re the Certificate of Need Application by the Bethany Med. Ctr. for a Six (6) Megavoltage Linear Accelerator, 630 P.2d 1136 (Kan. 1981). “The KDHE now seeks to have the district court’s decision affirming the KCC’s order that directs the KDHE to issue a certificate of need reversed.”
— K.S.A. § 65-4801(f) — 1 case
In Re the Certificate of Need Application by the Bethany Med. Ctr. for a Six (6) Megavoltage Linear Accelerator, 630 P.2d 1136 (Kan. 1981). “The KDHE now seeks to have the district court’s decision affirming the KCC’s order that directs the KDHE to issue a certificate of need reversed.”
— K.S.A. § 65-4801(j) — 1 case
Suburban Med. Ctr. v. Olathe Cmty. Hosp., 597 P.2d 654 (Kan. 1979). “All proceedings herein arise from the Health Facilities Act, K.S.A. 1976 Supp. 65-4801 et seq. Before proceeding to the facts of the case, it would be helpful to identify the various entities involved: 1.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.