Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 68-580 (2026)

Designation of streets and roads as arterial highways; definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

68-580. Designation of streets and roads as arterial highways; definitions. As used in this act:

(a) "County" means any county.

(b) "Board" means the board of county commissioners.

History: L. 1961, ch. 310, § 1; L. 1965, ch. 395, § 1; June 30.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1989–2008 · leading case: Blevins v. Hiebert, 795 P.2d 325 (Kan. 1990).
Blevins v. Hiebert, 795 P.2d 325 (Kan. 1990). · cites it 26× “The court found that K.S.A. 68-580 et seq. is a permissive statute and not the only method available for the County to authorize *5 construction of a highway.”
Genesis Health Club, Inc. v. City of Wichita, 181 P.3d 549 (Kan. 2008). · cites it 2× “This court agreed, ruling that a public vote should have been taken approving the bond issue under K.S.A. 68-580 et seq. We entered judgment for plaintiffs who had sought an injunction preventing the county from spending the money raised by the bonds without the approval of the…”
Blevins v. Bd. of Douglas Cnty. Comm'rs, 834 P.2d 1344 (Kan. 1992). · cites it 3× “In Blevins I, we found the County had exceeded its home rule authority in issuing the bonds and should have followed the provisions of K.S.A. 68-580 et seq., which requires a public vote approving bond issues of the type in question.”
Blevins v. Hiebert, 783 P.2d 1260 (Kan. 1989). · cites it 13× “The court found that K.S.A. 68-580 et seq. is a permissive statute and not the only method available for the County to authorize construction of a highway.”
Blevins v. Hiebert, 770 P.2d 486 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 6× “PROPRIETY OF ISSUING BONDS BY THE COUNTY UNDER HOME RULE The focus of Blevin’s appeal is that K.S.A. 68-580 et seq., the act dealing with arterial highways, specifically provides for what the county has done by resolution, but that the statutory authority under K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.