74-7024.
Exemptions from examination for licensure; reciprocity; certain license or certificate holders; fees; conditions.
Any person who holds a current license to practice any branch of the technical professions issued by the proper authority in any other state or political subdivision of the United States may be exempted from examination for licensure in this state if the requirements under which such license was issued are of a standard accepted by the board and if the person's record fully meets the requirements of this state in all respects other than examination. Upon determination that the person meets the requirements of this section and all other requirements for licensure under K.S.A. 74-7001 et seq., and amendments thereto, the board may issue, upon application therefor and receipt of payment of the application fee prescribed under K.S.A. 74-7009, and amendments thereto, a license to practice the appropriate technical profession.
History:
L. 1978, ch. 326, § 16; L. 1997, ch. 158, § 13; L. 2014, ch. 88, § 18; July 1.
Notes of Decisions
Bruns v. Kansas State Bd. of Technical Professions, 877 P.2d 391 (Kan. 1994).
· cites it 11× “The Statute K.S.A. 74-7024 states, in part: “(a) Any person who holds a current license or certificate of qualification or registration to practice any branch of the technical professions issued by the proper authority in any other state or political subdivision of the United…”
Bruns v. Kansas State Bd. of Technical Professions, 864 P.2d 1212 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993).
· cites it 4× “” Indeed, in this case, the BTP argues that it passed the policy in question to implement or interpret the provisions of K.S.A. 74-7024(a). The written “policy” under consideration contains the elements set forth in K.”
Hemphill v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 11 P.3d 1165 (Kan. 2000).
· cites it 2× “The version of K.S.A. 74-7024 applicable in Bruns stated, in part; “(a) Any person who holds a current license or certificate of qualification or registration to practice any branch of the technical professions issued by the proper authority in any other state or political…”
Abbott v. Kansas Bd. of Examiners in Optometry, 1 P.3d 318 (Kan. 2000).
· cites it 2× “The question for this court was whether the BTP properly interpreted the licensure statute, K.S.A. 74-7024(a), in applying an internal policy to deny Bruns' license application.”
Gilmore v. McKune, 940 P.2d 78 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).
“’ Under the facts shown, we conclude that the written policy in this case was passed by the BTP and utilized by the BTP to ‘govern its enforcement or administration of legislation.”
— K.S.A. § 74-7024(a) — 5 cases
Bruns v. Kansas State Bd. of Technical Professions, 877 P.2d 391 (Kan. 1994).
“The Statute K.S.A. 74-7024 states, in part: “(a) Any person who holds a current license or certificate of qualification or registration to practice any branch of the technical professions issued by the proper authority in any other state or political subdivision of the United…”
Bruns v. Kansas State Bd. of Technical Professions, 864 P.2d 1212 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993).
“” Indeed, in this case, the BTP argues that it passed the policy in question to implement or interpret the provisions of K.S.A. 74-7024(a). The written “policy” under consideration contains the elements set forth in K.”
Hemphill v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 11 P.3d 1165 (Kan. 2000).
“The version of K.S.A. 74-7024 applicable in Bruns stated, in part; “(a) Any person who holds a current license or certificate of qualification or registration to practice any branch of the technical professions issued by the proper authority in any other state or political…”
Abbott v. Kansas Bd. of Examiners in Optometry, 1 P.3d 318 (Kan. 2000).
“The question for this court was whether the BTP properly interpreted the licensure statute, K.S.A. 74-7024(a), in applying an internal policy to deny Bruns' license application.”
Gilmore v. McKune, 940 P.2d 78 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).
“’ Under the facts shown, we conclude that the written policy in this case was passed by the BTP and utilized by the BTP to ‘govern its enforcement or administration of legislation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.