75-6201.
Statement of policy.
The purpose of this act is to establish as policy that state agencies shall cooperate in identifying debtors who owe money to the state, a foreign state agency and any municipality and that procedures be established for setting off against debtors the sum of any debt owed to the state, a foreign state agency or any municipality.
History:
L. 1981, ch. 342, § 1; L. 1993, ch. 232, § 2; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Act considered in action to recover certain KPERS contributions; contract for payment of compensation plus KPERS benefits as fringe benefits valid under K.S.A. 74-4919. Donner v. Kansas Dept. of Human Resources, 236 Kan. 371, 373, 377, 691 P.2d 21 (1984).
2. Setoff act specifies priorities to multiple claims by state agency; it does not address priority of secured creditor's claim. Bank of Kansas v. Hutchinson Health Services, Inc., 13 Kan. App. 2d 421, 423, 773 P.2d 660 (1989).
3. Director of accounts and reports in dept. of administration need not personally attend to procedural requirements of act. Bank of Kansas v. Hutchinson Health Services, Inc., 246 Kan. 83, 87, 785 P.2d 1349 (1990).
Bank of Kansas v. Hutchinson Health Servs., Inc., 785 P.2d 1349 (Kan. 1990). · cites it 5דDHR also asserted that its right of setoff was superior to the rights of the Bank and that it had a “super priority” pursuant to either K.S.A. 75-6201 et seq. or K.S.A. 44-717. The Bank argued that Article 9 should be applied to determine priority between DHR and the Bank; that…”
Bank of Kansas v. Hutchinson Health Servs., Inc., 773 P.2d 660 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989). “DHR argues that the priority rules of Article 9 need not be applied to resolve this appeal because it, as an agency of the State, is entitled to “super-priority” under Kansas statutes allowing setoff against debtors of the State (K.S.A. 75-6201 et seq.) and the Kansas Employment…”
Donner v. Kansas Dep't of Human Resources, 691 P.2d 21 (Kan. 1984). · cites it 4ד: This is an appeal in an administrative proceeding, instituted pursuant to K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 75-6201 et seq., in which the Kansas Department of Human Resources (KDHR) sought repayment of contributions made to the Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) on behalf of…”
State v. Robinson (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). “20-169 must be read together with the statutes found in K.S.A. 75-6201 et seq., which establish a procedure for the setoff of debts owed to the state.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.