K.S.A. » Chapter 77
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 77-434 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

77-434.

History: L. 1965, ch. 506, § 20; L. 1977, ch. 321, § 18; Repealed, L. 1984, ch. 338, § 32; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Cited; requirement that plaintiffs request agency to pass on validity of regulation only a condition precedent to entering judgment. Rhodes v. Harder, 211 Kan. 820, 821, 822, 823, 824, 508 P.2d 959. Motion to modify decision; portion of original opinion withdrawn: 212 Kan. 500, 501, 512 P.2d 354.

2. Cited; declaratory judgment action may be brought to determine validity, construction or application of administrative rules and regulations. State ex rel. Stephan v. Kansas House of Representatives, 236 Kan. 45, 51, 52, 687 P.2d 622 (1984).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1973–1984 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Kansas House of Representatives, 687 P.2d 622 (Kan. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Kansas House of Representatives, 687 P.2d 622 (Kan. 1984). · cites it 8× “, and K.S.A. 77-434. K.S.A. 60-1701 authorizes courts of record in this state to issue declaratory judgments in cases of actual controversy.”
Country Club Home, Inc. v. Harder, 620 P.2d 1140 (Kan. 1980). · cites it 2× “This declaratory judgment action is authorized by K.S.A. 77-434 in which it is stated: “The court shall declare the rule and regulation invalid if it finds that it violates constitutional or statutory provisions, or exceeds the statutory authority of the agency, or was adopted…”
Rhodes v. Harder, 508 P.2d 959 (Kan. 1973). · cites it 4× “The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the action upon the grounds of improper venue and lack of jurisdiction which challenged the right of the plaintiffs to bring this action under Section 77-434. The motion was overruled.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.