K.S.A. » Chapter 77
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 77-622 (2026)

Relief on final disposition

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

77-622. Relief on final disposition. (a) The court may award damages or compensation only to the extent expressly authorized by another provision of law.

(b) The court may grant other appropriate relief, whether mandatory, injunctive or declaratory; preliminary or final; temporary or permanent; equitable or legal. In granting relief, the court may order agency action required by law, order agency exercise of discretion required by law, set aside or modify agency action, enjoin or stay the effectiveness of agency action, remand the matter for further proceedings, render a declaratory judgment or take any other action that is authorized and appropriate.

(c) The court may also grant necessary ancillary relief to redress the effects of official action wrongfully taken or withheld, but the court may award attorney's fees or witness fees only to the extent expressly authorized by other law.

(d) If the court sets aside or modifies agency action or remands the matter to the agency for further proceedings, the court may make any interlocutory order it finds necessary to preserve the interests of the parties and the public pending further proceedings or agency action.

History: L. 1984, ch. 338, § 22; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 52 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1987–2026 · leading case: Lindenman v. Umscheid, 875 P.2d 964 (Kan. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lindenman v. Umscheid, 875 P.2d 964 (Kan. 1994). · cites it 3× “We note the KJRA allows the district court to award damages to the extent expressly authorized by law (K.S.A. 77-622[a]) as well as any other appropriate relief, whether mandatory, injunctive, or declaratory; preliminary or final; temporary or permanent; equitable or legal.”
Foster v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 130 P.3d 560 (Kan. 2006). · cites it 2× “Griggs cites K.S.A. 77-622(b), *379 a provision of the Kansas Act for Judicial Review and Civil Enforcement of Agency Actions (KJRA), as authority for the district court’s dismissal of the license suspensions.”
Manzano v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 324 P.3d 321 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 9× “77-621, then K.S.A. 77-622 provides broad authority to grant appropriate relief.”
Corder v. Kansas Bd. of Healing Arts, 889 P.2d 1127 (Kan. 1994). · cites it 4× “” He argues that K.S.A. 77-622 of the Kansas Judicial Review Act authorizes imposition of damages against the Board under the Kansas Tort Claims Act.”
Sunflower Racing, Inc. v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 885 P.2d 1233 (Kan. 1994). · cites it 2× “Sunflower notes the court has the power to do so under K.S.A. 77-622(b). The county does not address this issue in its brief.”
Bruch v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 148 P.3d 538 (Kan. 2006). “In addition, because the remedies under K.S.A. 77-622 constitute the broad range of all remedies conceptually available, then die kind of agency action complained of need be identified as well as the kind of relief requested.”
Ryser v. State, 284 P.3d 337 (Kan. 2012). “77-621(c) (setting forth scope of review, listing eight different types of agency actions that may entitle a petitioner to relief); K.S.A. 77-622 (authorizing courts to award damages or compensation under some circumstances and to grant several different types of relief); K.”
10th Street Med., Inc. v. State, 210 P.3d 670 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “See K.S.A. 77-622(a) (“The court may award damages or compensation only to the extent expressly authorized by another provision of law.”
Friedman v. Kansas State Bd. of Healing Arts, 199 P.3d 781 (Kan. 2009). “See K.S.A. 77-622. Therefore, a request for that relief must be construed as a petition for judicial review subject to the KJRA, notwithstanding the attempt to label it as a separate action.”
Friedman v. Kan. State Bd. of Healing Arts, 199 P.3d 781 (Kan. 2009). “See K.S.A. 77-622. Therefore, a request for that relief must be construed as a petition for judicial review subject to the KJRA, notwithstanding the attempt to label it as a separate action.”
Karns v. Kansas State Bd. of Agric., 923 P.2d 78 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “In addition, because the remedies under K.S.A. 77-622 constitute the broad range of all remedies conceptually available, then the land of agency action complained of need be identified as well as the land of relief requested.”
Kansas Sunset Assocs. v. Kansas Dep't of Health & Env't, 818 P.2d 797 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “K.S.A. 77-622. However, in order to obtain this relief, the procedural requirements set forth in the KJRA must be followed.”
Show all 52 citing cases →
— K.S.A. § 77-622(a) — 3 cases
10th Street Med., Inc. v. State, 210 P.3d 670 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “See K.S.A. 77-622(a) (“The court may award damages or compensation only to the extent expressly authorized by another provision of law.”
Manzano v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 324 P.3d 321 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014). “77-621, then K.S.A. 77-622 provides broad authority to grant appropriate relief.”
Travelers Cas. Ins. v. Karns (Kan. Ct. App. 2021).
— K.S.A. § 77-622(b) — 33 cases
Foster v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 130 P.3d 560 (Kan. 2006). “Griggs cites K.S.A. 77-622(b), *379 a provision of the Kansas Act for Judicial Review and Civil Enforcement of Agency Actions (KJRA), as authority for the district court’s dismissal of the license suspensions.”
Sunflower Racing, Inc. v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 885 P.2d 1233 (Kan. 1994). “Sunflower notes the court has the power to do so under K.S.A. 77-622(b). The county does not address this issue in its brief.”
Manzano v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 324 P.3d 321 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014). “77-621, then K.S.A. 77-622 provides broad authority to grant appropriate relief.”
Lindenman v. Umscheid, 875 P.2d 964 (Kan. 1994). “We note the KJRA allows the district court to award damages to the extent expressly authorized by law (K.S.A. 77-622[a]) as well as any other appropriate relief, whether mandatory, injunctive, or declaratory; preliminary or final; temporary or permanent; equitable or legal.”
Taylor v. Kansas Dep't of Health & Env't, 305 P.3d 729 (Kan. Ct. App. 2013).
— K.S.A. § 77-622(c) — 3 cases
Lindenman v. Umscheid, 875 P.2d 964 (Kan. 1994). “We note the KJRA allows the district court to award damages to the extent expressly authorized by law (K.S.A. 77-622[a]) as well as any other appropriate relief, whether mandatory, injunctive, or declaratory; preliminary or final; temporary or permanent; equitable or legal.”
10th Street Med., Inc. v. State, 210 P.3d 670 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “See K.S.A. 77-622(a) (“The court may award damages or compensation only to the extent expressly authorized by another provision of law.”
Midwest Presbytery of the Synod of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North Am. v. Jefferson Cnty. Appraiser, 843 P.2d 277 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992).
— K.S.A. § 77-622(d) — 3 cases
Kansas Dep't of Transp. v. Humphreys, 967 P.2d 759 (Kan. 1998).
Travelers Cas. Ins. v. Karns (Kan. Ct. App. 2021).
Robinson v. Kansas Dept. of Health & Env't (Kan. Ct. App. 2024).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.