History:
L. 1974, ch. 29, § 3; L. 1975, ch. 427, § 15; L. 1976, ch. 40, § 5; L. 1987, ch. 46, § 1; Repealed, L. 1996, ch. 15, § 11; March 7.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Statutes providing for 55 mile an hour speed limit are not unconstitutional as delegation of legislative powers; alternative provisions. State v. Dumler, 221 Kan. 386, 388, 390, 391, 392, 559 P.2d 798.
2. Defective cruise control no defense to violation of section; absolute liability; K.S.A. 21-3204 applied. State v. Baker, 1 Kan. App. 2d 568, 569, 573, 571 P.2d 65.
3. Jury verdict of guilty of exceeding speed limit only held not "moving violation". State v. Herber, 1 Kan. App. 2d 732, 734, 573 P.2d 1112.
4. Conviction hereunder; judicial notice may be taken of reliability of radar whether mounted in a stationary or moving vehicle. State v. Primm, 4 Kan. App. 2d 314, 606 P.2d 112.
5. State's dismissal of action based on necessity and refiling same as not an avoidance of speedy trial limitations (K.S.A. 22-3402) examined. State v. Jamison, 248 Kan. 302, 303, 806 P.2d 972 (1991).
6. Noted in holding that amendment to K.S.A. 22-3404 eliminating right to jury trial for traffic infractions operates prospectively only. State v. Chapman, 15 Kan. App. 2d 643, 814 P.2d 449 (1991).
7. Procedure employed by another state in suspension of license considered in action involving driver charged hereunder. State v. Marshall, 252 Kan. 415, 845 P.2d 659 (1993).
State v. Baker, 571 P.2d 65 (Kan. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 3דBut, defendant readily concedes that a violation of the speeding statute (K.S.A. 1976 Supp. 8-1336) is an absolute liability offense when read in light of the absolute liability statute (K.”
Fillmore v. Ordonez, 829 F. Supp. 1544 (D. Kan. 1993). “On Monday, December 9, after conferring with Deputy Sheriffs Croucher, Manning, and Nitcher, the County Attorney charged plaintiff with one count of speeding in violation of K.S.A. 8-1336, one count of driving with a suspended driver’s license in violation of K.”
State v. Jamison, 806 P.2d 972 (Kan. 1991). · cites it 2ד1987 Supp. 8-1567(a)(1); driving while privileges suspended, canceled, or revoked, K.”
State v. Hopper, 917 P.2d 872 (Kan. 1996). “2d 65 (1977) (speeding, K.S.A. 1976 Supp. 8-1336[a][3]). In State v.”
State v. Primm, 606 P.2d 112 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980). “: This is an appeal from defendant’s conviction by a jury of speeding in violation of K.S.A. 8-1336. The defendant was fined $11 and costs.”
State v. Fisher, 661 P.2d 791 (Kan. 1983). “8-2106, charging him with traffic charges: exceeding the speed limit, K.S.A. 8-1336, and failing to produce and surrender his daily log for inspection, K.”
State v. Sullivan, 844 P.2d 741 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993). “8-262), and of speeding (K.S.A. 8-1336). After accepting the verdicts, the trial court stated: “This is not an — this did not involve obstruction of official duty in a misdemeanor case or in a civil case.”
State v. Chapman, 814 P.2d 449 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991). “Chapman, defendant, appeals his conviction for speeding (K.S.A. 1990 Supp. 8-1336), claiming that he was denied his right to trial by jury.”
State v. Choens, 580 P.2d 1298 (Kan. 1978). “8-1514, and/or speeding, K.S.A. 8-1336, by colliding with a vehicle occupied by Oscar M.”
State v. Marshall, 845 P.2d 659 (Kan. 1993). “Marshall was charged with speeding (K.S.A. 8-1336[a][3]) and driving while his license was suspended (K.”
State v. Herber, 573 P.2d 1112 (Kan. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 2דThe crime is set out in the Kansas Statutes as follows: “K.S.A. 8-1336. (a) Éxcept when a special hazard exists that requires lower speed for compliance with K.”
— K.S.A. § 8-1336(a)(3) — 1 case
State v. Baker, 571 P.2d 65 (Kan. Ct. App. 1977). “But, defendant readily concedes that a violation of the speeding statute (K.S.A. 1976 Supp. 8-1336) is an absolute liability offense when read in light of the absolute liability statute (K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.