8-1534.
Same; crossing roadway at location other than crosswalk.
(a) Every pedestrian crossing a roadway at any point other than within a marked crosswalk or within an unmarked crosswalk at an intersection shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles upon the roadway.
(b) Any pedestrian crossing a roadway at a point where a pedestrian tunnel or overhead pedestrian crossing has been provided shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles upon the roadway.
(c) Between adjacent intersections at which traffic-control signals are in operation pedestrians shall not cross at any place except in a marked crosswalk.
(d) No pedestrian shall cross a roadway intersection diagonally unless authorized by official traffic-control devices; and, when authorized to cross diagonally, pedestrians shall cross only in accordance with the official traffic-control devices pertaining to such crossing movements.
History:
L. 1974, ch. 33, § 8-1534; July 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 1983–2019 · leading case:
State v. Pollman, 441 P.3d 511 (Kan. Ct. App. 2019).
State v. Pollman, 441 P.3d 511 (Kan. Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 2× “See K.S.A. 8-1534(d); K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 8-2118(c).”
Reeve v. McBrearety, 660 P.2d 75 (Kan. Ct. App. 1983).
“As such, she was a pedestrian by statutory definition and as such it was her duty to yield the right of way to all vehicles upon that roadway as required by the rules of the road, specifically K.S.A. 8-1534(c) and K.S.A. 8-1537(d). Nevertheless, in formulating an instruction on…”
— K.S.A. § 8-1534(c) — 1 case
Reeve v. McBrearety, 660 P.2d 75 (Kan. Ct. App. 1983).
“As such, she was a pedestrian by statutory definition and as such it was her duty to yield the right of way to all vehicles upon that roadway as required by the rules of the road, specifically K.S.A. 8-1534(c) and K.S.A. 8-1537(d). Nevertheless, in formulating an instruction on…”
— K.S.A. § 8-1534(d) — 1 case
State v. Pollman, 441 P.3d 511 (Kan. Ct. App. 2019).
“See K.S.A. 8-1534(d); K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 8-2118(c).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.