History:
L. 1974, ch. 42, § 5; L. 1975, ch. 40, § 4; L. 1976, ch. 45, § 3; L. 1976, ch. 52, § 2; L. 1980, ch. 38, § 2; Repealed, L. 1984, ch. 35, § 6; March 15.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Duty to obtain certificate of approval per K.S.A. 8-1754 cannot be transferred to buyer even by agreement. State v. Mwaura, 4 Kan. App. 2d 738, 610 P.2d 662.
2. Special interest vehicle not to be sold at retail unless registered per K.S.A. 8-194, 8-195 or certificate of approval is issued within 90 days prior to sale; statute applicable to dealers. State v. Fagan, 5 Kan. App. 2d 12, 13, 610 P.2d 665.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1980–1987 · leading case: State v. Mwaura, 610 P.2d 662 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980).
State v. Mwaura, 610 P.2d 662 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980). “K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 8-1754 requires a certificate dated within 90 days of the sale, and goes on: “If no such certificate has been issued for any such motor vehicle, it shall be *739 the responsibility of the seller to obtain a valid certificate of approval for the motor vehicle in…”
R. B. Enter., Inc. v. State, 747 P.2d 152 (Kan. 1987). “K.S.A. 8-1754(a). Although the inspection was primarily for safety purposes, K.”
State v. Fagan, 610 P.2d 665 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 5דK.S.A. 1979 Supp. 8-1754(a) and 8-1758(o).”
K.S.A. § 8-1754(a): 2 cases
R. B. Enter., Inc. v. State, 747 P.2d 152 (Kan. 1987). “K.S.A. 8-1754(a). Although the inspection was primarily for safety purposes, K.”
State v. Fagan, 610 P.2d 665 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980). “K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 8-1754(a) and 8-1758(o).”
K.S.A. § 8-1754(o): 1 case
State v. Fagan, 610 P.2d 665 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980). “K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 8-1754(a) and 8-1758(o).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.