K.S.A. » Chapter 09
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 9-203 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

9-203.

History: L. 1909, ch. 61, § 3; L. 1921, ch. 74, § 1; L. 1923, ch. 72, § 1; R.S. 1923, § 9-203; Repealed, L. 1929, ch. 89, § 1; March 14.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Right and liability of bank on voluntary withdrawal considered. State, ex rel., v. Bone, 120 Kan. 620, 630, 244 P. 852.


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1976–2023 · leading case: Davis v. Brown (In re Brown), 479 B.R. 112 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Davis v. Brown (In re Brown), 479 B.R. 112 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2012). · cites it 6× “Section 9-203(b) sets out three requirements for enforceability.”
Am. State Bank v. Swearingen (In Re Swearingen), 27 B.R. 379 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1983). · cites it 5× “The official comment to § 9-203 states that in light of these minimal requisites, courts should not let creditors establish secured status by pa-rol evidence.”
Decatur Coop. Ass'n v. Urban, 547 P.2d 323 (Kan. 1976). · cites it 2× “” The official UCC comment following this statute states: “Purposes: “To fill the gap left by the Statute of Frauds provisions for goods (Section 2-201), securities (Section 8-319), and security interests (Section 9-203). Thus section 1-206 is expressly inapplicable to contracts…”
Kansas State Bank v. Overseas Motosport, Inc., 563 P.2d 414 (Kan. 1977). “It is clear that the security interest of the bank attached, pursuant to the provisions of sections 9-203 and 9-204, above set forth.”
Morris v. Ark Valley Credit Union, 536 B.R. 887 (D. Kan. 2015). · cites it 2× “Further, [t]he purpose of requiring a description of collateral in a security agreement under Section 9-203 is evidentiary. The test of sufficiency of a description under this section .”
In Re Griffin, 141 B.R. 207 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1992). “If so authorized, the obligor under the note has “rights in the collateral” sufficient for the security interest to attach under § 9-203(l)(c). K.N.C. Wholesale, Inc. v. AWMCO, Inc.”
Gicinto v. Credithrift of Am., No. 3, Inc., 549 P.2d 870 (Kan. 1976). “1972); 1972 Official Comment 5 to § 9-203, 3 U. L. A. U. C. G, 1975 Supp. at 232.”
In Re Trotter, 264 B.R. 216 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2001). “12A, § 9-203(1) a security interest attaches when the debtor has signed a security agreement describing the collateral, value has been given, and the debt- or has rights in the collateral.”
United States v. Dunn (D. Kan. 2023). “(first citing UCC § 9-203(a)–(b); and then citing UCC § 9-609).”
In Re Stout, 284 B.R. 511 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2002). “The new version of § 9-203 provides that a “security interest attaches to collateral when it becomes enforceable against the debtor with respect to collateral, unless an agreement expressly postpones the time of attachment.”
— K.S.A. § 9-203(1) — 1 case
In Re Trotter, 264 B.R. 216 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2001). “12A, § 9-203(1) a security interest attaches when the debtor has signed a security agreement describing the collateral, value has been given, and the debt- or has rights in the collateral.”
— K.S.A. § 9-203(a) — 1 case
United States v. Dunn (D. Kan. 2023). “(first citing UCC § 9-203(a)–(b); and then citing UCC § 9-609).”
— K.S.A. § 9-203(b) — 1 case
Davis v. Brown (In re Brown), 479 B.R. 112 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2012). “Section 9-203(b) sets out three requirements for enforceability.”
— K.S.A. § 9-203(b)(3)(A) — 1 case
Davis v. Brown (In re Brown), 479 B.R. 112 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2012). “Section 9-203(b) sets out three requirements for enforceability.”
— K.S.A. § 9-203(b)(3)(B) — 1 case
Davis v. Brown (In re Brown), 479 B.R. 112 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2012). “Section 9-203(b) sets out three requirements for enforceability.”
— K.S.A. § 9-203(b)(3)(D) — 1 case
Davis v. Brown (In re Brown), 479 B.R. 112 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2012). “Section 9-203(b) sets out three requirements for enforceability.”
— K.S.A. § 9-203(l)(c) — 1 case
In Re Griffin, 141 B.R. 207 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1992). “If so authorized, the obligor under the note has “rights in the collateral” sufficient for the security interest to attach under § 9-203(l)(c). K.N.C. Wholesale, Inc. v. AWMCO, Inc.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.