Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 118
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 118.070 (2026)

Repealed, 1972

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Persons entitled to have name placed on ballot for regular election. History: Repealed 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 188, sec. 69, effective December 1, 1972. -- Amended 1964 Ky. Acts ch. 83, sec. 2, effective June 18, 1964. -- Amended 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 174, sec. 1. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 1453, 1550-1c, 1550-1d, 1550-1e, 1550-1f, 1550-4, 1550-5, 1550-9, 1550-33.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1967–1973 · leading case: Mann v. Cornett, 445 S.W.2d 853 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mann v. Cornett, 445 S.W.2d 853 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 4× “KRS 118.070 prescribes the rules as to persons who are entitled to have their names placed on the ballot for regular elections.”
Fletcher v. Wilson, 495 S.W.2d 787 (Ky. Ct. App. 1973). “2d 316 , where it was held that a voter could, by suit before the general election, question the sufficiency of the nominating petition of a candidate whose nomination was by petition rather than through a primary (for the office of member of a school board — see KRS 118.070) ,…”
Ferguson v. Rohde, 449 S.W.2d 758 (Ky. Ct. App. 1970). “KRS 118.070. Rohde had done all that the law required of him to assure his name’s being included on the voting machines ; his name was not so included.”
Hallahan v. Moody, 419 S.W.2d 770 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967). · cites it 4× “225was repealed by implication by the ¡subsequent re-enactment of KRS 118.070, 118.080, and 118.130; and (3) in any event, KRS 86.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 118.070(1) — 1 case
Mann v. Cornett, 445 S.W.2d 853 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). “KRS 118.070 prescribes the rules as to persons who are entitled to have their names placed on the ballot for regular elections.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.