Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 118.450 (2026)

Repealed, 1972

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Cost of elections -- Payment -- Voting machines, acquisition. History: Repealed 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 188, sec. 69, effective December 1, 1972. -- Amended 1968 Ky. Acts ch. 152, sec. 97, effective June 13, 1968. -- Amended 1962 Ky. Acts ch. 33, sec. 1, effective June 14, 1962; and ch. 210, sec. 19, effective June 14, 1962. -- Amended 1960 Ky. Acts ch. 129, sec. 1, effective June 16, 1960. -- Amended 1946 Ky. Acts ch. 25, sec. 1. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 1452, 1540.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1948–1963 · leading case: State Prop. & Bldgs. Comm'n v. Hays, 346 S.W.2d 3 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961).
State Prop. & Bldgs. Comm'n v. Hays, 346 S.W.2d 3 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). · cites it 7× “Subsections (1) through (3), the original statute, relate to the cost of elections and provide for reimbursement by the state to the county of a certain portion of election expenses, not exceeding $20 per precinct. Subsection (4) requires all counties to acquire voting machines…”
Jefferson Cnty. Fiscal Court v. Queenan, 234 S.W.2d 949 (Ky. Ct. App. 1950). · cites it 2× “County Clerk, both those who work throughout the year permanently and those who work temporarily as extras, and who are engaged in repairing and keeping in good mechanical condition the voting machines used in our elections, and the cost of material necessarily used in…”
City of Louisville v. Jefferson Cnty. Fiscal Court, 212 S.W.2d 107 (Ky. Ct. App. 1948). “There is no provision in Chapter 125 relative to the cost of elections, therefore we must turn to KRS 118.450 dealing with the cost of elections, the applicable portions of which read: “(1) The printing and delivery of ballots and cards of instruction to voters shall, in city…”
Lackey v. Garner, 367 S.W.2d 257 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963). · cites it 3× “The General Assembly of Kentucky at its regular session in 1960 enacted into law KRS 118.450(4) which reads as follows: “Each county shall acquire voting machines meeting the specification of Section 125.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 118.450(3) — 1 case
State Prop. & Bldgs. Comm'n v. Hays, 346 S.W.2d 3 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). “Subsections (1) through (3), the original statute, relate to the cost of elections and provide for reimbursement by the state to the county of a certain portion of election expenses, not exceeding $20 per precinct. Subsection (4) requires all counties to acquire voting machines…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 118.450(4) — 2 cases
State Prop. & Bldgs. Comm'n v. Hays, 346 S.W.2d 3 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). “Subsections (1) through (3), the original statute, relate to the cost of elections and provide for reimbursement by the state to the county of a certain portion of election expenses, not exceeding $20 per precinct. Subsection (4) requires all counties to acquire voting machines…”
Lackey v. Garner, 367 S.W.2d 257 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963). “The General Assembly of Kentucky at its regular session in 1960 enacted into law KRS 118.450(4) which reads as follows: “Each county shall acquire voting machines meeting the specification of Section 125.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 118.450(6) — 1 case
State Prop. & Bldgs. Comm'n v. Hays, 346 S.W.2d 3 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). “Subsections (1) through (3), the original statute, relate to the cost of elections and provide for reimbursement by the state to the county of a certain portion of election expenses, not exceeding $20 per precinct. Subsection (4) requires all counties to acquire voting machines…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 118.450(7) — 1 case
State Prop. & Bldgs. Comm'n v. Hays, 346 S.W.2d 3 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). “Subsections (1) through (3), the original statute, relate to the cost of elections and provide for reimbursement by the state to the county of a certain portion of election expenses, not exceeding $20 per precinct. Subsection (4) requires all counties to acquire voting machines…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.