Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 123
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 123.070 (2026)

Repealed, 1966

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Statement of contributions and expenditures to be filed by candidate prior and subsequent to election date. History: Repealed 1966 Ky. Acts ch. 216, sec. 14. -- Amended 1944 Ky. Acts ch. 173, sec. 7. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 1565b-4, 1565b-6.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1960–1979 · leading case: Roberts v. Byrd, 344 S.W.2d 378 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Roberts v. Byrd, 344 S.W.2d 378 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). · cites it 8× “As the trial judge indicated m his findings of fact, they were led into a mistake in this respect because they had previously filed their pre-election statement, as KRS 123.070(1) requires, with the county clerk.”
Dupin v. Sullivan, 355 S.W.2d 676 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962). “Lastly, it was alleged and is repeated in the brief- for appellants that the successful candidates did not file the expense statements required by the Corrupt *679 Practices Act, KRS 123.070. Failure to comply with this statue disqualifies the candidate, KRS 123.”
Britton v. Garland, 335 S.W.2d 329 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960). “Within the time specified in KRS 123.070, Mrs. Garland filed her post-election statement showing a total expenditure of • $507.”
Kentucky Registry of Election Fin. v. Jordan, 583 S.W.2d 90 (Ky. Ct. App. 1979). “060, nor a certificate of election to any person until he has filed the statements required by KRS 123.070. Neither the Secretary of State nor the county clerk shall certify the name of any candidate to be placed on the ballot in the regular election until the statements…”
Withrow v. Willis, 447 S.W.2d 627 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). “050 until he has complied with KRS 123.070(1). The Legislature, being fully informed as to how this court has emasculated the 1916 Act and conscious of the fact that officials are not prone to prosecute those who violate election laws, placed the following provisions in the…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 123.070(1) — 2 cases
Roberts v. Byrd, 344 S.W.2d 378 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). “As the trial judge indicated m his findings of fact, they were led into a mistake in this respect because they had previously filed their pre-election statement, as KRS 123.070(1) requires, with the county clerk.”
Withrow v. Willis, 447 S.W.2d 627 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). “050 until he has complied with KRS 123.070(1). The Legislature, being fully informed as to how this court has emasculated the 1916 Act and conscious of the fact that officials are not prone to prosecute those who violate election laws, placed the following provisions in the…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 123.070(2) — 1 case
Roberts v. Byrd, 344 S.W.2d 378 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). “As the trial judge indicated m his findings of fact, they were led into a mistake in this respect because they had previously filed their pre-election statement, as KRS 123.070(1) requires, with the county clerk.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.