Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.320
Repealed, 1962
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Catchline at repeal: Contributing to delinquency of children prohibited. History: Repealed 1962 Ky. Acts ch. 212, sec. 12. -- Amended 1954 Ky. Acts ch. 193, sec. 1. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 331g-1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1944–2013 · leading case: McDonald v. Commonwealth
McDonald v. Commonwealth (1960)
“KRS 199.320(1). He was sentenced to twelve months’ confinement in jail.”
Hale v. Commonwealth (2013)
“2d at 717 (construing KRS 199.320, the very similar predecessor of KRS 208.”
Beauchamp, Judge v. Cahill (1944)
“990 for the offense denounced in KRS 199.320 of contributing to the delinquency of a child.”
Arlan's Department Store of Louisville v. Commonwealth (1963)
“KRS 199.320(1). 3 The law of the colonies to the time of the Revolution was 29 Charles II, c.”
Smith v. Commonwealth (1962)
“The Judge of the Jackson County Court, sitting as Judge of the Quarterly Court, tried Millard Smith and Offia Carpenter on a warrant charging them with contributing to conditions which caused five children (named Carpenter) to become delinquent or neglected “contrary to KRS…”
Hall v. Commonwealth (1966)
“2d 716 , in discussing KRS 199.320(1) which has been re-enacted as KRS 208.”
Baker v. Jolly (1960)
“KRS 199.320. He was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for six months on each charge, with the three terms to run concurrently.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.320(1) — 3 cases
McDonald v. Commonwealth (1960)
“KRS 199.320(1). He was sentenced to twelve months’ confinement in jail.”
Arlan's Department Store of Louisville v. Commonwealth (1963)
“KRS 199.320(1). 3 The law of the colonies to the time of the Revolution was 29 Charles II, c.”
Hall v. Commonwealth (1966)
“2d 716 , in discussing KRS 199.320(1) which has been re-enacted as KRS 208.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.