Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 199
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.630 (2026)

Repealed, 1978

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Form of order terminating parental rights -- Recording and certification -- Status of parties after termination. History: Repealed 1978 Ky. Acts ch. 137, sec. 18, effective June 17, 1978. -- Created 1950 Ky. Acts ch. 125, sec. 26.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1954–1977 · leading case: Smith v. Wilson, 269 S.W.2d 255 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Smith v. Wilson, 269 S.W.2d 255 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954). “KRS 199.630(2). Subsection (5) of KRS 199.”
Hill v. Garner, 561 S.W.2d 106 (Ky. Ct. App. 1977). “(Emphasis added) KRS 199.630(2) specifically speaks as to the status of parties after termination: (2) .”
Commonwealth, Dep't of Child Welfare v. Helton, 411 S.W.2d 932 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967). “Helton appeared before the presiding judge of that court, and on March 19, 1964, there was entered an “Order Terminating Parental Rights and Order of Judgment” as prescribed by KRS 199.630. It is observed that the order recited that the matter had been heard on the petition of…”
Kentucky Trust Co. v. Sweeney, 163 F. Supp. 450 (W.D. Ky. 1958). · cites it 4× “” Under this statute she had no legal relationship to her birth parents and neither she nor her executors can share in the distribution of this estate by right of representation under KRS 391.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 199.630(2) — 3 cases
Smith v. Wilson, 269 S.W.2d 255 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954). “KRS 199.630(2). Subsection (5) of KRS 199.”
Hill v. Garner, 561 S.W.2d 106 (Ky. Ct. App. 1977). “(Emphasis added) KRS 199.630(2) specifically speaks as to the status of parties after termination: (2) .”
Kentucky Trust Co. v. Sweeney, 163 F. Supp. 450 (W.D. Ky. 1958). “” Under this statute she had no legal relationship to her birth parents and neither she nor her executors can share in the distribution of this estate by right of representation under KRS 391.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.