Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 216C
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 216C.180 (2026)

Repealed, 2019

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Opinion of medical review panel after submission of all evidence -- Conclusion to be reached by majority of voting panel members -- Effect of opinion. (Declared void) History: Repealed 2019 Ky. Acts ch. 180, sec. 2, effective June 27, 2019. -- Created 2017 Ky. Acts ch. 22, sec. 19, effective June 29, 2017.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2018–2022 · leading case: Mark Smith & Chinena Smith v. Wynetta Fletcher, Aprn (Ky. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mark Smith & Chinena Smith v. Wynetta Fletcher, Aprn (Ky. 2020). · cites it 2× “15 KRS 216C.180(1). The panel’s opinion was its final action, and after it gave its opinion as to each defendant, “the panel is dissolved and shall take no further action.”
Est. of Kendrick Bell, Jr. by & Through Lenise Bell as Adm'x v. Laurie Craycroft, M.D. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “KRS 216C.180(1). The panel’s opinion was its final action, and after it gave its opinion as to each defendant, “the panel is dissolved and shall take no further action.”
Craig Snowden v. Kevin Snyder Art M.D. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). “170(2) (providing for the right to request information and conduct a hearing); and KRS 216C.180(1) (providing the MRP with the sole duty to issue an opinion as to the proposed complaint after which the panel would be dissolved).”
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Cabinet for Health & Fam. Servs. Ex Rel., Adam Meier, in His Off. Capacity as Sec'y of the Cabinet for Health & Fam. Servs. v. Ezra Claycomb a Minor, by & Through His Next Friend, Nat. Guardian & Parent (Ky. 2018). “6 See KRS 216C.180. 7 See KRS 216C.030(l). 4 guarantees under Sections 7, 14, 54, and 241; (3) the separation of powers doctrine under Sections 27, 28, 109, and 116; (4) the prohibition against special legislation under Sections 59 and 60; and (5) the subject and title…”
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Cabinet for Health & Fam. Servs. Ex Rel. Adam Meier, in His Off. Capacity as Sec'y of the Cabinet for Health & Fam. Servs. v. Ezra Claycomb a Minor, by & Through His Next Friend, Nat. Guardian & Parent (Ky. 2018). “6 See KRS 216C.180. 7 See KRS 216C.030(l). 4 guarantees under Sections 7, 14, 54, and 241; (3) the separation of powers doctrine under Sections 27, 28, 109, and 116; (4) the prohibition against special legislation under Sections 59 and 60; and (5) the subject and title…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 216C.180(1) — 3 cases
Mark Smith & Chinena Smith v. Wynetta Fletcher, Aprn (Ky. 2020). “15 KRS 216C.180(1). The panel’s opinion was its final action, and after it gave its opinion as to each defendant, “the panel is dissolved and shall take no further action.”
Craig Snowden v. Kevin Snyder Art M.D. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). “170(2) (providing for the right to request information and conduct a hearing); and KRS 216C.180(1) (providing the MRP with the sole duty to issue an opinion as to the proposed complaint after which the panel would be dissolved).”
Est. of Kendrick Bell, Jr. by & Through Lenise Bell as Adm'x v. Laurie Craycroft, M.D. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). “KRS 216C.180(1). The panel’s opinion was its final action, and after it gave its opinion as to each defendant, “the panel is dissolved and shall take no further action.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 216C.180(4) — 2 cases
Mark Smith & Chinena Smith v. Wynetta Fletcher, Aprn (Ky. 2020). “15 KRS 216C.180(1). The panel’s opinion was its final action, and after it gave its opinion as to each defendant, “the panel is dissolved and shall take no further action.”
Est. of Kendrick Bell, Jr. by & Through Lenise Bell as Adm'x v. Laurie Craycroft, M.D. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). “KRS 216C.180(1). The panel’s opinion was its final action, and after it gave its opinion as to each defendant, “the panel is dissolved and shall take no further action.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.