Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 220.542 (2026)

Procedure for increase in service charge, rate, or user fee -- Districts with

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

fewer than 10,000 customer accounts exempted. (1) If the rate increase in a service charge, rate, or user fee is greater than five percent (5%) of the previous charge, rate, or user fee, then the increase shall be subject to the provisions of subsections (2) and (3) of this section. (2) In a district consisting of only one (1) county, before a proposed service charge, rate, or user fee may be adopted by the district board of directors of a district, it shall receive the approval of the fiscal court or legislative body of the county having jurisdiction over the district. (3) In a district governed by the provisions of KRS 220.135, or otherwise having jurisdiction in two (2) or more counties, before a proposed service charge, rate, or user fee may be adopted by the district board of directors, it shall receive the approval of a majority of the fiscal courts or legislative bodies of the counties having jurisdiction over a part of the district. Each approval of a fiscal court shall be equally weighted. (4) A service charge, rate, or user fee shall not be increased more than once in a twelve (12) month period. (5) The provisions of this section shall not apply to a district formed under this chapter with fewer than ten thousand (10,000) customer accounts. Effective: June 8, 2011 History: Created 2011 Ky. Acts ch. 98, sec. 13, effective June 8, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2015–2015 · leading case: Coppage Constr. Co. v. Sanitation Dist. No. 1, 459 S.W.3d 855 (Ky. 2015).
Coppage Constr. Co. v. Sanitation Dist. No. 1, 459 S.W.3d 855 (Ky. 2015). “KRS 220.542. However, a governmental entity’s authority to appoint board members does not (in and of itself) create an agency relationship.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.