become dry or moist -- Recovery of money paid for unexpired period of license -- Issuance of retail alcoholic beverage license in any dry territory prohibited.
(1) After a territory becomes dry or moist, any previously issued license that is no longer available in that territory shall become invalid, but the licensee shall be entitled to recover from the county or city to which the license money was paid, a part of the license money proportionate to the unexpired period of the license.
(2) No retail alcoholic beverage license shall be issued in any dry territory. Effective: June 25, 2013 History: Amended 2013 Ky. Acts ch. 121, sec. 22, effective June 25, 2013. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 2554c-15.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
4
cases, 1950–1994 · leading case:
Howard v. Salyer, 695 S.W.2d 420 (Ky. 1985).
Howard v. Salyer, 695 S.W.2d 420 (Ky. 1985).
· cites it 2× “125(2) concludes as follows: If the majority of votes cast in the county outside of such cities of the first four classes are for prohibition, KRS 242.220 to 242.430 shall apply to all of the county outside of such cities.”
Parrott v. Belcher, 884 S.W.2d 634 (Ky. 1994).
· cites it 6× “125(1) which is as follows: (1) In any county in which the provisions of KRS 242.220 to 242.430 are applicable by reason of an election for the entire county having heretofore resulted in favor of prohibition, an election may be held in any city of the first four (4) classes in…”
Karloftis v. Mills, 229 S.W.2d 477 (Ky. Ct. App. 1950).
· cites it 4× “Subsection 3 of the Act reads: “(3) If, in any city-wide election hereafter held in a city of the first four classes for the purpose of taking the sense of the voters as to the adoption or discontinuance of the application of KRS 242.220 to 242.430 to such city, other than an…”
Halcomb v. Faulkner, 238 S.W.2d 162 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951).
“county, with respect to the application of KRS 242.220 to 242.430, shall be governed by the election held within such portion, or in the individual precincts within such portions, as provided in this section.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.