Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 278.192 (2026)

Test period for proposed rate increase

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) For the purpose of justifying the reasonableness of a proposed general increase in rates, the commission shall allow a utility to utilize either an historical test period of twelve (12) consecutive calendar months, or a forward-looking test period corresponding to the first twelve (12) consecutive calendar months the proposed increase would be in effect after the maximum suspension provided in KRS 278.190(2). (2) (a) Any application utilizing a forward-looking test period shall include a base period to be filed with the application, which begins not more than nine (9) months prior to the date of filing, consisting of not less than six (6) months of actual historical data and not more than six (6) months of estimated data at the time of filing. (b) Actual results for the estimated months of the base period shall be filed no later than forty-five (45) days after the last day of the base period. (c) Upon the filing of an application for a proposed increase in rates based on either a historical or a forward-looking test period, any intervening party in opposition to such application shall have the right to examine all data, including individual invoices, which comprise the actual expenditures of the utility incurred for ratemaking purposes for the preceding twelve (12) month period immediately prior to the filing date. Effective: July 14, 1992 History: Created 1992 Ky. Acts ch. 308, sec. 1, effective July 14, 1992.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2010–2010 · leading case: Kentucky Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Conway, 324 S.W.3d 373 (Ky. 2010).
Kentucky Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Conway, 324 S.W.3d 373 (Ky. 2010). · cites it 2× “KRS 278.192 states that the Commission may allow a utility to use either a historical 12-month test period or a forward-looking 12 month test period to determine the reasonability of a general rate increase.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.