Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 355.9-101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This article may be cited as Uniform Commercial Code -- Secured Transactions. Effective: July 1, 2001 History: Repealed and reenacted 2000 Ky. Acts ch. 408, sec. 21, effective July 1, 2001. -- Created 1958 Ky. Acts ch. 77, sec. 9-101, effective July 1, 1960.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 10 cases, 1975–2014 · leading case: Meade v. Richardson Fuel, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 55 (Ky. Ct. App. 2005).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Meade v. Richardson Fuel, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 55 (Ky. Ct. App. 2005). “KRS 355.9-101, et seq. 6 . David J. Leibson, Richard H.”

Delphi Auto. Sys., LLC v. Capital Cmty. Econ./Indus. Dev. Corp., 434 S.W.3d 481 (Ky. 2014). “We find nothing in In re Moran that persuades us to ignore the clear directives of KRS 355.9-101 to .9-809. There is nothing inherently wrong in requiring a government or governmental unit which takes a security interest in equipment to comply with Article 9 by filing a…”

Citizens Fid. Bank & Trust Co. v. Fenton Rigging Co., 522 S.W.2d 862 (Ky. Ct. App. 1975). “KRS 355.9-101 through 355.9-507, Secured Transactions, detail the procedure parties must follow in order to obtain a lien upon accounts receivable.”

Whayne Supply Co. v. Commonwealth Revenue Cabinet, 925 S.W.2d 185 (Ky. 1996). “420(2) has priority in proceeds of collateral over a purchase money security interest in the same collateral (hereinafter “PMSI”) filed under KRS 355.9-101. The facts of the case are not in dispute.”

In Re Hopper, 17 B.R. 292 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 1982). “Employing the standard of Cunningham, supra, a determination then becomes necessary as to the date upon which a security interest was granted pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted by the State of Kentucky in Chapter 355 of the Kentucky Revised…”

In Re Harris, 17 B.R. 210 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 1982). “Employing the standard of Cunningham, supra, a determination then becomes necessary as to the date upon which a security interest was granted pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted by the State of Kentucky in Chapter 355 of the Kentucky Revised…”

In Re Calloway, 17 B.R. 212 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 1982). “Employing the standard of Cunningham, supra, a determination then becomes necessary as to the date upon which a security interest was granted pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted by the State of Kentucky in Chapter 355 of the Kentucky Revised…”

In Re Fulkerson, 17 B.R. 207 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 1982). “Employing the standard of Cunningham, supra, a determination then becomes necessary as to the date upon which a security interest was granted pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted by the State of Kentucky in Chapter 355 of the Kentucky Revised…”

In Re Wilson, 17 B.R. 350 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 1982). “Employing the standard of Cunningham, supra, a determination then becomes necessary as to the date upon which a security interest was granted pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted by the State of Kentucky in Chapter 355 of the Kentucky Revised…”

In re Proctor, 27 B.R. 7 (W.D. Ky. 1982). “Employing the standard of Cunningham, supra, a determination then becomes necessary as to the date upon which a security interest was granted pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted by the State of Kentucky in Chapter 355 of the Kentucky Revised…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.