Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 367.250 (2026)

Subpoenas -- Oath -- Confidential information

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

To accomplish the objectives and to carry out the duties prescribed by KRS 367.110 to 367.300, the Attorney General, in addition to other powers conferred upon him by KRS 367.110 to 367.300, may issue subpoenas to any person, administer an oath or affirmation to any person, or conduct hearings in aid of any investigation or inquiry, provided that information obtained pursuant to the powers conferred by KRS 367.110 to 367.300 shall not be made public or disclosed by the Attorney General or his employees beyond the extent necessary for law enforcement purposes in the public interest. History: Created 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 4, sec. 15.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2022–2023 · leading case: Commonwealth of Kentucky, Ex Rel. Attorney Gen. Daniel Cameron, in His Off. Capacity as Attorney Gen. of Kentucky v. Jones & Panda, LLC (Ky. Ct. App. 2022).
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Ex Rel. Attorney Gen. Daniel Cameron, in His Off. Capacity as Attorney Gen. of Kentucky v. Jones & Panda, LLC (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 3× “True, the Attorney General did not name KRS 367.250 specifically during the October 2021 hearing, but the Attorney General did refer to statutes requiring confidentiality, thus preserving the argument sufficiently for this appeal.”
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Ex Rel. Attorney Gen. Daniel Cameron, in His Off. Capacity as Attorney Gen. of Kentucky v. Jones & Panda, LLC (Ky. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 3× “True, the Attorney General did not name KRS 367.250 specifically during the October 2021 hearing, but the Attorney General did refer to statutes requiring confidentiality, thus preserving the argument sufficiently for this appeal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.