A person who continues to exercise an office after having committed an act, or omitted to
do an act, the commission or omission of which, by law, creates a forfeiture of his office,
may be proceeded against for usurpation thereof.
Effective: July 1, 1953
History: Transferred 1952 Ky. Acts ch. 84, sec. 1, effective July 1, 1953, from C.C.
sec. 486.
Notes of Decisions
State Bd. for Elementary & Secondary Educ. v. Ball, 847 S.W.2d 743 (Ky. 1993).
· cites it 2× “KRS 415.060 states: A person who continues to exercise an office after having committed an act, or omitted to do an act, the commission or omission of which, by law, creates a forfeiture of his office, may be proceeded against for usurpation thereof.”
Jones v. Robinson, 351 S.W.2d 185 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961).
· cites it 2× “We have no difficulty in declaring that this suit is concerned with forfeiture of an office because KRS 415.060 (C.C. § 486) provides: “A person who continues to exercise an office after having committed an act, or omitted to do an act, the commission or omission of which, by…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.