Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 434
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 434.060 (2026)

Repealed, effective January 1, 1975

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Obtaining money by false personation -- Personating another in legal acts -- Fraudulently displaying badge of organization. History: Repealed 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 406, sec. 336, effective January 1, 1975. -- Amended 1954 Ky. Acts ch. 108, sec. 1, effective June 17, 1954. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 1209, 1211, 1376a.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1958–1968 · leading case: Int'l Free & Accepted Modern Masons v. Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge, Free & Accepted Masons of Kentucky, 318 S.W.2d 46 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Int'l Free & Accepted Modern Masons v. Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge, Free & Accepted Masons of Kentucky, 318 S.W.2d 46 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958). “Here, priority of origin and incorporation in Kentucky and in territorial use, as well as confusion and misrepresentation, are the bases of the exclusive right claimed and adjudged to belong to the appellees, Prince Hall Masons. As is well known, the order of Free and Accepted…”
Davidson v. Commonwealth, 436 S.W.2d 495 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968). “050, the false pretenses statute, but more like a violation of KRS 434.060, the false personation statute.”
Rowland v. Commonwealth, 355 S.W.2d 292 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962). “It is covered by KRS 434.060, but that statute expressly limits the occasions where a person may be prosecuted for personating another, and the facts of this case do not place it under any category set forth.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 434.060(2) — 1 case
Int'l Free & Accepted Modern Masons v. Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge, Free & Accepted Masons of Kentucky, 318 S.W.2d 46 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958). “Here, priority of origin and incorporation in Kentucky and in territorial use, as well as confusion and misrepresentation, are the bases of the exclusive right claimed and adjudged to belong to the appellees, Prince Hall Masons. As is well known, the order of Free and Accepted…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.