Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 435
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 435.230 (2026)

Repealed, effective January 1, 1975

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Carrying concealed deadly weapon -- Selling deadly weapon to minor. History: Repealed 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 406, sec. 336, effective January 1, 1975. -- Amended 1970 Ky. Acts ch. 19, sec. 1; and ch. 172, sec. 1. -- Amended 1946 Ky. Acts ch. 40, sec. 1. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 1309, 1313.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 42 cases, 1944–1977 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Strickland, 375 S.W.2d 701 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Commonwealth v. Strickland, 375 S.W.2d 701 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). · cites it 2× “On December 24, 1959, while awaiting trial in the criminal division of the Jefferson Circuit Court on an indictment charging him with the felony of carrying concealed a deadly weapon (KRS 435.230), the appellee, Strickland, was committed to Central State Hospital at Lakeland for…”
Beason v. Commonwealth, 548 S.W.2d 835 (Ky. 1977). “William Edward Beason was tried and convicted of carrying a concealed deadly weapon, KRS 435.230, 1 and sentenced to two years’ imprisonment.”
Hall v. Commonwealth, 215 S.W.2d 840 (Ky. Ct. App. 1948). · cites it 2× “It is contended that KRS 435.230 was not intended by the Legislature to be applicable to the state of case shown by this record.”
Phillips v. Commonwealth, 473 S.W.2d 135 (Ky. Ct. App. 1971). · cites it 2× “Appellant was indicted in the Fayette Circuit Court and tried for violation of KRS 435.230, carrying concealed on or about his person a deadly weapon.”
Cowan v. Commonwealth, 407 S.W.2d 695 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966). “220) and the other in 1952 for carrying concealed a deadly weapon (KRS 435.230). These were proved in chief through the circuit court clerk and county attorney.”
Rake v. Commonwealth, 450 S.W.2d 527 (Ky. Ct. App. 1970). “38-caliber revolver, in violation of KRS 435.230, and was given the maximum sentence.”
Prince v. Commonwealth, 277 S.W.2d 470 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955). · cites it 2× “Appellant, Randall Prince, was convicted in the Wayne Circuit Court of carrying concealed a deadly weapon upon his person, a crime denounced by Section 435.230, KRS, and his punishment was fixed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.”
Williams v. Commonwealth, 202 S.W.2d 408 (Ky. Ct. App. 1947). · cites it 3× “It is argued on this appeal that a razor is not necessarily a deadly weapon within the contemplation of KRS 435.230, as amended by the 1946 Ceneral Assembly, and *762 that whether or not a razor is a deadly weapon within the meaning of that statute depends on the purpose for…”
Parrott v. Commonwealth, 287 S.W.2d 440 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). “Jack Parrott appeals from a judgment of the'Harlan Circuit Court which found him guilty of carrying concealed a deadly weapon in violation of KRS 435.230. The sentence imposed was two years in the penitentiary.”
Williams v. Commonwealth, 261 S.W.2d 807 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953). “583 , 33 A. 438 ; Note 63, 68 C.J. 16. The condemnation of our statute is against anyone “[carrying] concealed a deadly weapon,, other than an ordinary pocket knife, on or about his person”.”
United States v. Charles Edward Benner, 417 F.2d 421 (9th Cir. 1969). “§ 21-2411 (1963)); Kentucky (Ky.Rev.Stat. § 435.230 (1962)); Maine (Me.”
Collins v. Commonwealth, 297 S.W.2d 54 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). “in violation of KRS 435.230(1), and was given a sentence of two years in the state reformatory at LaGrange.”
Show all 42 citing cases →
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 435.230(1) — 4 cases
Collins v. Commonwealth, 297 S.W.2d 54 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). “in violation of KRS 435.230(1), and was given a sentence of two years in the state reformatory at LaGrange.”
Scamahorne v. Commonwealth, 357 S.W.2d 30 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962).
Morgan v. Commonwealth, 310 S.W.2d 281 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958).
Taylor v. Commonwealth, 386 S.W.2d 480 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.