Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 500

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 500.010

Title

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

KRS Chapters 500 to 534 shall be known as the Kentucky Penal Code. Effective: January 1, 1975 History: Created 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 406, sec. 1, effective January 1, 1975.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1984–2010 · leading case: Winstead v. Commonwealth
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Winstead v. Commonwealth (2010) ky · cites it 2× “See KRS 500.010 ("KRS Chapters 500 to 534 shall be known as the Kentucky Penal Code.”
Hon v. Commonwealth (1984) ky · cites it 2× “KRS 500.010; Adams v. Commonwealth, Ky., 551 S.”
Robertson v. Commonwealth (2002) ky · cites it 2× “Specifically, KRS 500.010(1) defines “culpable mental state” as “ ‘intentionally’ or ‘knowingly’ or ‘wantonly’ or ‘recklessly’ as those terms are defined in KRS 501.”
Saxton v. Commonwealth (2010) ky “See KRS 500.010. As noted, all criminal offenses relating to controlled substances are codified outside of the Kentucky Penal Code in a separate, largely self-contained chapter of the Kentucky Revised Statutes, KRS Chapter 218A.”
Commonwealth v. Lopez (2009) ky “KRS 500.010 provides that the Kentucky Penal Code consists of KRS Chapters 500 to 534.”
Reynolds v. Commonwealth (2003) kyctapp “KRS 500.010. 5 . The instructions also defined escape as "the departure from custody or the detention facility in which a person is held or detained with knowledge that the departure is unpermitted, or failure to return to custody or detention following a temporary leave granted…”
Toppass v. Commonwealth (2002) kyctapp “KRS 500.010 et seq. (effective June 17, 1978).”
Jones v. Commonwealth (1995) kyctapp “KRS 500.010; Adams v. Commonwealth, Ky., 551 S.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 500.010(1) — 1 case
Robertson v. Commonwealth (2002) ky “Specifically, KRS 500.010(1) defines “culpable mental state” as “ ‘intentionally’ or ‘knowingly’ or ‘wantonly’ or ‘recklessly’ as those terms are defined in KRS 501.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.