Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 65
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 65.008 (2026)

Expiration of term of appointed member of governing body of authority

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) At least sixty (60) days before the expiration of the term of office of an appointed member of a district's governing body, the district shall notify the appointing authority of the forthcoming expiration of the term of the appointed member of the district's governing body. (2) Unless otherwise provided by law, appointed members of district governing bodies shall serve until their successors are appointed and qualified. The failure of an appointing authority to appoint a successor or, if the appointing authority's appointment is subject to the approval of a legislative body, to nominate a successor within sixty (60) days of the expiration of the term of office of a member of a district governing body shall constitute the reappointment of that member for another term of office. Effective: July 13, 1984 History: Created 1984 Ky. Acts ch. 63, sec. 3, effective July 13, 1984.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2021–2021 · leading case: Lincoln Trail Grain Growers Ass'n v. Meade Cnty. Fiscal Court (Ky. Ct. App. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lincoln Trail Grain Growers Ass'n v. Meade Cnty. Fiscal Court (Ky. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 4× “008(2) do not apply because the Riverport Authority failed to notify the Fiscal Court of the impending expiration of terms, as required by KRS 65.008(1). And finally, they contend that Hardesty and Bewley do not have standing to challenge the adoption of the lease termination…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 65.008(1) — 1 case
Lincoln Trail Grain Growers Ass'n v. Meade Cnty. Fiscal Court (Ky. Ct. App. 2021). “008(2) do not apply because the Riverport Authority failed to notify the Fiscal Court of the impending expiration of terms, as required by KRS 65.008(1). And finally, they contend that Hardesty and Bewley do not have standing to challenge the adoption of the lease termination…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 65.008(2) — 1 case
Lincoln Trail Grain Growers Ass'n v. Meade Cnty. Fiscal Court (Ky. Ct. App. 2021). “008(2) do not apply because the Riverport Authority failed to notify the Fiscal Court of the impending expiration of terms, as required by KRS 65.008(1). And finally, they contend that Hardesty and Bewley do not have standing to challenge the adoption of the lease termination…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.