Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 65.8801 (2026)

Purpose of KRS 65.8801 to 65.8839

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

It is the intent of KRS 65.8801 to 65.8839 to protect, promote, and improve the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens residing within the local governments of this state by authorizing the creation of administrative boards with the authority to issue remedial orders and impose civil fines in order to provide an equitable, expeditious, effective, and inexpensive method of ensuring compliance with the ordinances in force in local governments. KRS 65.8801 to 65.8839 is intended and shall be construed to provide an additional or supplemental means of obtaining compliance with local government ordinances, and nothing contained in KRS 65.8801 to 65.8839 shall prohibit the enforcement of local government ordinances by any other means authorized by law. Effective: July 15, 1996 History: Created 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 177, sec. 1, effective July 15, 1996.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2010–2026 · leading case: Louisville Metro Health Dep't v. Highview Manor Ass'n, 319 S.W.3d 380 (Ky. 2010).
Louisville Metro Health Dep't v. Highview Manor Ass'n, 319 S.W.3d 380 (Ky. 2010). · cites it 4× “KRS 65.8801 to 65.8839 authorize, as an alternative to district court enforcement of local ordinances, the creation of “administrative boards with the authority to issue remedial orders and impose civil fines in order to provide an equitable, expeditious, effective, and…”
Short v. City of Olive Hill, 414 S.W.3d 433 (Ky. Ct. App. 2013). “Thus, Olive Hill has argued, and we believe correctly, that the Code Enforcement Officer was never required to issue any affidavit of compliance or noncompliance with same.”
Williams v. City of Stanford, Kentucky (E.D. Ky. 2021). · cites it 2× “§§ 65.8801, et seq. Stanford adopted the changes through Ordinance 2017-0501 (“Ordinance 501”).”
Kim Telesford-Mapp v. Waterside Tax Serv. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). “02,2 to vacate the order costs incurred by the purchaser after the sale for maintenance or repair of the property, including but not limited to utility expenses, insurance, association fees, taxes, and the costs to conform the property to the minimum standards of local nuisance…”
M E Wood v. Bruce Clewell (Ky. Ct. App. 2024). “ten percent (10%) per annum interest thereon, and any reasonable costs incurred by the purchaser after the sale for maintenance or repair of the property, including but not limited to utility expenses, insurance, association fees, taxes, and the costs to conform the property to…”
M E Wood v. Bruce Clewell (Ky. Ct. App. 2024). “ten percent (10%) per annum interest thereon, and any reasonable costs incurred by the purchaser after the sale for maintenance or repair of the property, including but not limited to utility expenses, insurance, association fees, taxes, and the costs to conform the property to…”
Arnold (W.D. Ky. 2026). “§ 65.8801. A hearing was scheduled as mandated by Ky.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.