Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 12
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 4701 (2026)

Procedure; hearing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1967, c. 348 (NEW). PL 1969, c. 379, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 336, §§1-3 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 618, §§11,17 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 256 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 595, §1 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1973–1974 · leading case: Blaney v. Rittall, 312 A.2d 522 (Me. 1973).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Blaney v. Rittall, 312 A.2d 522 (Me. 1973). · cites it 5× “) and Wetlands Act (12 M.R.S.A. § 4701 et seq.), respectively.”
Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. Env't Improvement Comm'n, 307 A.2d 1 (Me. 1973). “12 M.R.S.A. § 4701 et seq. (1969). 36 . Hence, it was not an ad valorem tax.”
Finks v. Maine State High. Comm'n, 328 A.2d 791 (Me. 1974). “Since we are disposing of the ease on another ground, we do not reach the issue raised by the plaintiffs to the effect that the Wetlands Control Act vested exclusive control over their property, which consists primarily of marshes and tidal flats, in the Board of Environmental…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.