Maine Revised Statutes
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 5503 (2026)
Jurisdiction; commencement of proceedings; petition; amendments
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1979, c. 701, §2 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1970–1981 · leading case: Shorette v. State, 402 A.2d 450 (Me. 1979).
Shorette v. State, 402 A.2d 450 (Me. 1979). “Nevertheless, in view of the jurat’s immediate apposition to the affidavit in support of the motion for appointment of counsel and not to the verification itself, we will proceed to resolve the jurisdictional issue, whether the affidavit in itself is a sufficient verification of…”
Lewisohn v. State, 433 A.2d 351 (Me. 1981). “By administrative practice, in carrying out his responsibilities under 14 M.R.S.A. § 5503 (1980) and 15 M.R.S.A.”
Higgins v. Robbins, 265 A.2d 90 (Me. 1970). “The jurisdictional requirement of verification under 14 M.R.S.A. § 5503 was therefore lacking and the Court below for this reason had no jurisdiction to entertain the amended petition.”
Duguay v. State, 309 A.2d 234 (Me. 1973). “Petitioner seasonably appealed. We deny the appeal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.