Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 16
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 16, § 1 (2026)

Applicability of provisions to executors, administrators or heirs

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1977, c. 564, §75 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1978–1978 · leading case: Ziehl Ex Rel. Ziehl v. Maine Nat'l Bank, 383 A.2d 1364 (Me. 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ziehl Ex Rel. Ziehl v. Maine Nat'l Bank, 383 A.2d 1364 (Me. 1978). “Defendants also contended that the admission in evidence of the testimony which showed these circumstances, because that testimony consisted of plaintiffs narration of conversation between her and the testators, violated the rule excluding hearsay evidence, as well as the “dead…”
Kirk v. Marquis, 391 A.2d 335 (Me. 1978). “Rule 601 of the Maine Rules of Evidence, which became effective on February 2,1976, abolished the “Dead Man’s Rule” previously contained in 16 M.R.S.A. § 1(2). Ziehl v. Maine National Bank, Me.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 16, § 1(2) — 1 case
Kirk v. Marquis, 391 A.2d 335 (Me. 1978). “Rule 601 of the Maine Rules of Evidence, which became effective on February 2,1976, abolished the “Dead Man’s Rule” previously contained in 16 M.R.S.A. § 1(2). Ziehl v. Maine National Bank, Me.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.