Maine Revised Statutes
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17, § 2107 (2026)
Embezzlement or fraudulent conversion; receiver liable
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1975, c. 499, §11 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1968–1980 · leading case: State v. St. Clair, 418 A.2d 184 (Me. 1980).
State v. St. Clair, 418 A.2d 184 (Me. 1980). “Clair appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the Superior Court (Androscoggin County) upon the verdict of a jury finding her guilty of embezzlement (17 M.R.S.A. § 2107). She asserts three points on appeal: (1) that the indictment was fatally deficient; (2) that the…”
State v. Rowe, 238 A.2d 217 (Me. 1968). “Forrest Anthony Rowe, appellant, at the June 1967 session of the Grand Jury for the County of Androscoggin, was indicted for violation of 17 M.R.S.A. § 2107, the indictment charging him with the embezzlement of money in the amount of one hundred twenty-five ($125.”
State v. Marcotte, 418 A.2d 1118 (Me. 1980). “So far as the court is informed, at no time prior to the present indictment in 1979 has the State during all the 28 years of the sales tax even once charged any retailer with criminal liability under section 358 ("theft by misapplication of property") or its pre-Code…”
State v. Bull, 249 A.2d 881 (Me. 1969). “This is an appeal from an interlocutory ruling in the Superior Court denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss an indictment charging larceny by embezzlement under 17 M.R.S.A. § 2107. 1 The case was properly reported to us under Rule 37A(a) M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.