Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 17
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17, § 2108 (2026)

Prosecution for embezzlement or conversion by cashier or other officer

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1975, c. 499, §11 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1969–1980 · leading case: State v. St. Clair, 418 A.2d 184 (Me. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. St. Clair, 418 A.2d 184 (Me. 1980). · cites it 3× “The same provisions were retained thereafter and are reflected for our present purposes in 17 M.R.S.A. § 2108 (1965): “[I]t is sufficient to allege generally in the indictment an embezzlement, fraudulent conversion or taking with such intent, of money to a certain amount,…”
State v. Bull, 249 A.2d 881 (Me. 1969). “The issues thus stated are: (1) Does the indictment charge sufficient facts to constitute the offense of embezzlement, as defined by the laws of Maine ?; (2) Is 17 M.R.S.A. § 2108 3 unconstitutional under the Maine or Federal Constitution? Count (1) of the indictment charged:…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.