Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 17
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17, § 2805 (2026)

Farm, farm operation or agricultural composting operation not nuisance; use of best management practices

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1981, c. 472 (NEW). PL 1991, c. 395, §§1-3 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 87, §1 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 124, §§3,4 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 642, §§4,5 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 723, §2 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 283, §6 (AMD). PL 2005, c. 638, §1 (AMD). PL 2007, c. 649, §7 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1983–2012 · leading case: Clifford v. Klein, 463 A.2d 709 (Me. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Clifford v. Klein, 463 A.2d 709 (Me. 1983). “” Plaintiffs contend that the court erred, arguing that the court has the inherent power to modify a judgment to avoid a substantial injustice. They contend that this power does not depend on whether the judgment was entered pursuant to consent.”
Velda J. Shore v. Maple Lane Farms, LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). “; Maine, Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 17, § 2805 ; Maryland, Md.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17, § 2805(2) — 1 case
Clifford v. Klein, 463 A.2d 709 (Me. 1983). “” Plaintiffs contend that the court erred, arguing that the court has the inherent power to modify a judgment to avoid a substantial injustice. They contend that this power does not depend on whether the judgment was entered pursuant to consent.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.