Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 21
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 21, § 1355 (2026)

Review of initiative and referendum petitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1975, c. 682, §3 (NEW). PL 1985, c. 161, §5 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1983–1983 · leading case: Allen v. Quinn, 459 A.2d 1098 (Me. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Allen v. Quinn, 459 A.2d 1098 (Me. 1983). · cites it 5× “[11] Arguments of counsel based upon asserted inconsistencies between the constitution and the implementing statute, 21 M.R.S.A. § 1355, thus get us nowhere in divining the meaning of the constitution.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 21, § 1355(1) — 1 case
Allen v. Quinn, 459 A.2d 1098 (Me. 1983). “[11] Arguments of counsel based upon asserted inconsistencies between the constitution and the implementing statute, 21 M.R.S.A. § 1355, thus get us nowhere in divining the meaning of the constitution.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 21, § 1355(2) — 1 case
Allen v. Quinn, 459 A.2d 1098 (Me. 1983). “[11] Arguments of counsel based upon asserted inconsistencies between the constitution and the implementing statute, 21 M.R.S.A. § 1355, thus get us nowhere in divining the meaning of the constitution.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.