Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 2384 (2026)

Sale

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1969, c. 443, §7 (NEW). PL 1971, c. 472, §3 (RPR). PL 1973, c. 510 (RPR). PL 1975, c. 499, §52 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1972–1978 · leading case: State v. Parker, 372 A.2d 570 (Me. 1977).
State v. Parker, 372 A.2d 570 (Me. 1977). · cites it 3× “Defendant Michael Parker has appealed from each of two Superior Court (Kennebec County) judgments adjudicating him convicted of having sold “cannabis” in violation of 22 M.R.S.A. § 2384. 1 On June 3,1975 two separate indictments were returned against defendant.”
State v. Donovan, 344 A.2d 401 (Me. 1975). · cites it 9× “The defendant, Patrick Donovan, was indicted by the Androscoggin grand jury, in successive counts, for the sale and the attempted sale of Cannabis in violation of 22 M.R.S.A. § 2384. The persons to whom the indictment charged the defendant with selling and attempting to sell…”
State v. McCrillis, 376 A.2d 95 (Me. 1977). · cites it 3× “§ 2210-A) and selling marijuana (22 M.R.S.A. § 2384). In a consolidated trial before a jury held January 21-22, 1976 defendant was found guilty as charged in each indictment.”
State v. Kidder, 302 A.2d 320 (Me. 1973). · cites it 3× “The Defendant entered a plea of guilty to an indictment which charged him with an unlawful sale of marijuana in violation of 22 M.R.S.A. § 2384(4), 1 The Defendant received a sentence to the Men’s Correctional Center.”
State v. Willey, 363 A.2d 739 (Me. 1976). “Willey was charged with possession of marijuana with intent to sell (22 M.R.S.A. § 2384) and possession of hallucinogenic drugs (22 M.”
State v. Shaw, 343 A.2d 210 (Me. 1975). · cites it 2× “Shaw was indicted for selling cannabis in violation of 22 M.R.S.A. § 2384. 1 Having waived trial by jury, the case was presented to a single Justice of the Superior Court who found the defendant guilty and sentenced him accordingly.”
State v. Sargent, 361 A.2d 248 (Me. 1976). “22 M.R.S.A. § 2384. We deny the appeal. It was the State’s claim that the appellant made an unlawful sale of marijuana to an undercover agent of the Penobscot Re-ginal Special Investigation Unit.”
State v. Sherburne, 366 A.2d 1127 (Me. 1976). “22 M.R.S.A. § 2384 (repealed 1975, Laws of Maine, c.”
State v. Carvelle, 290 A.2d 190 (Me. 1972). “Carvelle was indicted for violating the provisions of 22 M.R.S.A. § 2384, 1 tried and convicted.”
State v. Bowen, 366 A.2d 174 (Me. 1976). “22 M.R.S.A. § 2384. The indictments were consolidated for trial.”
State v. Carter, 379 A.2d 991 (Me. 1977). · cites it 2× “22 M.R.S.A. § 2384 (repealed and replaced by 17-A M.”
State v. Whittemore, 390 A.2d 1046 (Me. 1978). “1975) were necessarily constituent parts of the elements of the crime of sale of cannabis under former 22 M.R.S.A. § 2384 (Supp.1975). Under those assumptions, the issue on appeal becomes whether the trial court’s refusal to instruct as requested affected any substantial rights…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 2384(4) — 1 case
State v. Kidder, 302 A.2d 320 (Me. 1973). “The Defendant entered a plea of guilty to an indictment which charged him with an unlawful sale of marijuana in violation of 22 M.R.S.A. § 2384(4), 1 The Defendant received a sentence to the Men’s Correctional Center.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.