Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 22
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 4507 (2026)

Right to a fair hearing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1973, c. 788, §94 (NEW). PL 1977, c. 417, §14 (RPR). PL 1983, c. 577, §17 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1982–1984 · leading case: Jackson v. Inhabitants of Town of Searsport, 456 A.2d 852 (Me. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jackson v. Inhabitants of Town of Searsport, 456 A.2d 852 (Me. 1983). · cites it 3× “No such hearing was held, in apparent violation of both 22 M.R.S.A. § 4507 and the town ordinance.”
Gregory v. Town of Pittsfield, 479 A.2d 1304 (Me. 1984). · cites it 2× “The court further granted summary judgment in plaintiffs’ favor on their claim that defendants’ failure to make written decisions within 24 hours of the date of their applications for assistance, as prescribed by 22 M.R.S.A. §§ 4504(3)(C), 4505 (1980), and defendants’ failure to…”
Beaulieu v. City of Lewiston, 440 A.2d 334 (Me. 1982). “A fair hearing, held pursuant to 22 M.R.S.A. § 4507 and Lewiston Rev. Ordinances ch.”
Blouin v. City of Rockland, 441 A.2d 1008 (Me. 1982). · cites it 2× “See 22 M.R.S.A. § 4507; Rockland General Assistance Ordinance § VII.”
Page v. City of Auburn, 440 A.2d 363 (Me. 1982). “The Pages commenced this action pursuant to 22 M.R.S.A. § 4507 (1980) and M.R.Civ.P. 80B to obtain judicial review of a decision of the City of Auburn Fair Hearing Authority finding Mr.”
Carson v. Town of Oakland, 442 A.2d 170 (Me. 1982). · cites it 3× “See 22 M.R.S.A. § 4507 (1980). The Fair Hearing Authority, in its decision, stated that after reviewpng] the decision of the Town Manager .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.