Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 26
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 26, § 883 (2026)

Mediation procedure; duties

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1973, c. 617, §1 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1998–2004 · leading case: Stanley v. Hancock Cnty. Commissioners, 2004 ME 157 (Me. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stanley v. Hancock Cnty. Commissioners, 2004 ME 157 (Me. 2004). “2d 509, 514 ; see also 26 M.R.S.A. § 883(1), (2) (1988 & Supp. 2004).”
DiCentes v. Michaud, 1998 ME 227 (Me. 1998). “See 26 M.R.S.A. § 883(1). Michaud’s recommendation, although found to have been made in part based on a retaliatory motive, was also found not to have affected any of the conditions of DiCentes’s employment.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 26, § 883(1) — 2 cases
Stanley v. Hancock Cnty. Commissioners, 2004 ME 157 (Me. 2004). “2d 509, 514 ; see also 26 M.R.S.A. § 883(1), (2) (1988 & Supp. 2004).”
DiCentes v. Michaud, 1998 ME 227 (Me. 1998). “See 26 M.R.S.A. § 883(1). Michaud’s recommendation, although found to have been made in part based on a retaliatory motive, was also found not to have affected any of the conditions of DiCentes’s employment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.