Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 29
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 2508 (2026)

Unlawful to operate an uninspected or defective vehicle or to fail to display an inspection certificate

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1979, c. 464, §5 (NEW). PL 1989, c. 866, §§B23,26 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 388, §12 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 683, §A1 (RP). PL 1993, c. 683, §B5 (AFF).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1982–1993 · leading case: State v. Butler, 627 A.2d 530 (Me. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Butler, 627 A.2d 530 (Me. 1993). “On March 8, 1990, Butler was issued a Uniform Traffic Ticket and Complaint for failure to display a valid or current certificate of inspection, 29 M.R.S.A. § 2508(2) (Pamph.1992). Butler pleaded guilty and the District Court imposed a fine of $50.”
State v. MacKerron, 446 A.2d 420 (Me. 1982). “Defendant appeals from his conviction in Superior Court (Cumberland County) for operating an uninspected motor vehicle, 1 in violation of 29 M.R.S.A. § 2508 (Supp.1981). We are required once again to address the sufficiency of a statement of an offense as set forth in a uniform…”
State v. Lamarre, 553 A.2d 1260 (Me. 1989). “Lamarre also appeals from his conviction in the Superior Court, Lincoln County {Bradford, J.”
State v. Reynolds, 468 A.2d 984 (Me. 1983). “On March 22, 1983, after a two day jury trial, judgments of conviction were entered against defendant for operating a motor vehicle without a valid inspection sticker in violation of 29 M.R.S.A. § 2508(2) (Supp. 1982), and for eluding an officer in violation of 29 M.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 2508(2): 2 cases
State v. Butler, 627 A.2d 530 (Me. 1993). “On March 8, 1990, Butler was issued a Uniform Traffic Ticket and Complaint for failure to display a valid or current certificate of inspection, 29 M.R.S.A. § 2508(2) (Pamph.1992). Butler pleaded guilty and the District Court imposed a fine of $50.”
State v. Reynolds, 468 A.2d 984 (Me. 1983). “On March 22, 1983, after a two day jury trial, judgments of conviction were entered against defendant for operating a motor vehicle without a valid inspection sticker in violation of 29 M.R.S.A. § 2508(2) (Supp. 1982), and for eluding an officer in violation of 29 M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.