Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 30
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 30, § 6201 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
This Act shall be known and may be cited as "AN ACT to Implement the Maine Indian Claims Settlement."   [PL 1979, c. 732, §§ 1, 31 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1979, c. 732, §§1,31 (NEW).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2021 · leading case: In re Child. of Mary J., 2019 ME 2 (Me. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Child. of Mary J., 2019 ME 2 (Me. 2019). “Archive), and the Maine Indian Claims Settlement Implementing Act (Implementing Act), 30 M.R.S. §§ 6201 - 6214 (2017), were the result of a comprehensive settlement between the Penobscot Nation, Passamaquoddy Tribe, and the State of Maine, resolving the Tribe's and Nation's…”
Francis v. Pleasant Point Passamaquoddy Hous. Auth., 1999 ME 164 (Me. 1999). “Francis contends that the Superior Court erred as a matter of law in finding that the Housing Authority’s acts constituted an “internal tribal matter” pursuant to 30 M.R.S.A. § 6201 (1996), and, therefore, it lacked jurisdiction to hear the cause of action.”
Aroostook Band of Micmacs v. Exec. Dir. Maine Human Rights Comm'n, 307 F. Supp. 2d 95 (D. Me. 2004). “3 The status of the Band’s sovereignty, the Band believes, requires an interpretation of the effect on the Band of a trio of pre and post MMA statutes: the Maine Implementing Act (MIA), 30 M.R.S.A. § 6201 et seq., the Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act (MICSA), 25 U.”
United States v. Frey (1st Cir. 2021). “" Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 6202 ; see 25 U.”
State of Maine v. Mccarthy (D. Me. 2020). “Maine disputed EPA’s interpretation of the Clean Water Act, the Maine Act to Implement the Indian Land Claims Settlement, 30 M.R.S.A. §§ 6201, et. seq. (West 2018) (the “Maine Implementing Act”), and the Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act of 1980, 25 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.