Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 31, § 287 (2026)

Rules for determining the existence of a partnership

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1973, c. 377, §1 (NEW). PL 2005, c. 543, §A1 (RP). PL 2005, c. 543, §A3 (AFF).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1988–2007 · leading case: John Nagle Co. v. Gokey, 2002 ME 101 (Me. 2002).
John Nagle Co. v. Gokey, 2002 ME 101 (Me. 2002). · cites it 2× “Although the sharing of profits is prima facie evidence of a partnership, 31 M.R.S.A. § 287(4) (1996), its absence does not automatically preclude the existence of a partnership relationship.”
Knowles v. Sprague, 544 A.2d 314 (Me. 1988). · cites it 2× “” 31 M.R.S.A. § 287(1) (1978). Thus, *316 Francis Soule is liable to the Plaintiff only if he and Grover Sprague were partners as to each other.”
McCurtain v. Morrill (Me. Super. Ct 2007). “Although the sharing of profits is prima facie evidence of a partnership, 31 M.R.S.A. § 287(4) (2006), its absence does not automatically preclude the existence of a partnership relationship.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 31, § 287(1) — 1 case
Knowles v. Sprague, 544 A.2d 314 (Me. 1988). “” 31 M.R.S.A. § 287(1) (1978). Thus, *316 Francis Soule is liable to the Plaintiff only if he and Grover Sprague were partners as to each other.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 31, § 287(4) — 2 cases
John Nagle Co. v. Gokey, 2002 ME 101 (Me. 2002). “Although the sharing of profits is prima facie evidence of a partnership, 31 M.R.S.A. § 287(4) (1996), its absence does not automatically preclude the existence of a partnership relationship.”
McCurtain v. Morrill (Me. Super. Ct 2007). “Although the sharing of profits is prima facie evidence of a partnership, 31 M.R.S.A. § 287(4) (2006), its absence does not automatically preclude the existence of a partnership relationship.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.