Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 32
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 1077 (2026)

Disciplinary actions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1983, c. 378, §7 (NEW). PL 1993, c. 600, §A62 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 547, §B60 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 547, §B80 (AFF). RR 2009, c. 2, §87 (COR). PL 2011, c. 581, §1 (AMD). PL 2013, c. 105, §4 (AMD). PL 2015, c. 135, §1 (AMD). PL 2015, c. 429, §17 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2003–2008 · leading case: State v. Dhuy, 2003 ME 75 (Me. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Dhuy, 2003 ME 75 (Me. 2003). “The Board found that Dhuy violated 32 M.R.S.A. § 1077(2)(F), (H) (1999 & Supp.”
Moore v. State of Maine Bd. of Dental Exam'rs (Me. Super. Ct 2008). · cites it 2× “Additionally, the Board found petitioner in violation of 32 M.R.S.A. § 1077(2)(E)2 for failure to provide dental care that meets the minimum accepted standards of practice.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 1077(2)(E) — 1 case
Moore v. State of Maine Bd. of Dental Exam'rs (Me. Super. Ct 2008). “Additionally, the Board found petitioner in violation of 32 M.R.S.A. § 1077(2)(E)2 for failure to provide dental care that meets the minimum accepted standards of practice.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 1077(2)(F) — 2 cases
State v. Dhuy, 2003 ME 75 (Me. 2003). “The Board found that Dhuy violated 32 M.R.S.A. § 1077(2)(F), (H) (1999 & Supp.”
Moore v. State of Maine Bd. of Dental Exam'rs (Me. Super. Ct 2008). “Additionally, the Board found petitioner in violation of 32 M.R.S.A. § 1077(2)(E)2 for failure to provide dental care that meets the minimum accepted standards of practice.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.