Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 34
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 34, § 1633 (2026)

Violation of probation

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 45, §2 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 134 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 590, §§66E,66F (AMD). PL 1971, c. 172, §8 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 499, §70 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1967–1970 · leading case: State v. Allen, 235 A.2d 529 (Me. 1967).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Allen, 235 A.2d 529 (Me. 1967). “At the March Term 1966, the Probation and Parole Board filed a motion dated February 28, 1966, under the provisions of 34 M.R.S.A. § 1633, for revocation of the probation, alleging reasonable belief that the appellant had violated the conditions of his probation and complaining,…”
State v. Oliver, 247 A.2d 122 (Me. 1968). “34 M.R.S.A. § 1633—violation of probation.”
Skidgell v. State, 264 A.2d 8 (Me. 1970). “The parties agree that the issue submitted to us is whether or not Petitioner’s constitutional rights were violated by reason that he was not represented by counsel at his probation revocation hearing.”
State v. Smith, 256 A.2d 580 (Me. 1969). · cites it 2× “” At the June term of the Superior Court, 1968 the State Probation and Parole Board filed its report and charged the defendant with violation of the conditions of his probation, 34 M.R.S.A. § 1633, and the presiding justice, after hearing, found Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.