Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 34
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 34, § 1671 (2026)

Parole by board

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1967, c. 391, §27 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 172, §9 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 499, §71 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1965–1970 · leading case: Mottram v. State, 232 A.2d 809 (Me. 1967).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mottram v. State, 232 A.2d 809 (Me. 1967). · cites it 4× “Although released from the institution where his sentence demanded his detention, the paroled prisoner remains under the custody of the warden or superintendent, and is serving the unexpired portion of his sentence, less deductions for good behavior, but is under the immediate…”
Still v. State, 256 A.2d 670 (Me. 1969). · cites it 3× “34 M.R.S.A. §§ 1671, 1675. On October 27, 1965 our decision in Collins v.”
Collins v. State, 213 A.2d 835 (Me. 1965). “34 M.R.S.A. § 1671. The parole officer to whom the inmate is assigned is charged with supervising “* * * the conduct and condition of each person placed under his supervision and to use suitable methods to encourage him to improve his conduct and condition; * * 34 M.”
Bernier ex rel. Bernier v. State, 265 A.2d 604 (Me. 1970). “Revocation is by judgment of the Court after hearing.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 34, § 1671(1): 1 case
Mottram v. State, 232 A.2d 809 (Me. 1967). “Although released from the institution where his sentence demanded his detention, the paroled prisoner remains under the custody of the warden or superintendent, and is serving the unexpired portion of his sentence, less deductions for good behavior, but is under the immediate…”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 34, § 1671(2): 1 case
Mottram v. State, 232 A.2d 809 (Me. 1967). “Although released from the institution where his sentence demanded his detention, the paroled prisoner remains under the custody of the warden or superintendent, and is serving the unexpired portion of his sentence, less deductions for good behavior, but is under the immediate…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.