Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 35
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35, § 2301 (2026)

Organization

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 348, §1 (AMD). PL 1967, c. 279, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1967, c. 382, §1 (RPR). PL 1967, c. 416, §2 (AMD). PL 1967, c. 544, §91 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 439, §19 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 660, §1 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 304, §3 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 141, §A5 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1965–1996 · leading case: Town of Madison, Dep't of Elec. Works v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 682 A.2d 231 (Me. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Town of Madison, Dep't of Elec. Works v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 682 A.2d 231 (Me. 1996). · cites it 8× “1966), that the consent requirement, codified at 35 M.R.S.A. § 2301 [1] did not apply to charter utilities.”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Maine Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 395 A.2d 414 (Me. 1978). · cites it 2× “Determine that Sobin’s plan for taking an electricity feed at Bucksport is not inconsistent with 35 M.R.S.A. § 2301 and order CMP to provide electric service to Sobin in Bucksport for ultimate use in Orrington; or “2.”
Poland Tel. Co. v. Pine Tree Tel. & Tel. Co., 218 A.2d 487 (Me. 1966). “” 35 M.R.S.A. §§ 2301,2302,2303. The decisive question is whether Poland may provide its services in the disputed area without a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued under Section 2302 by the Commission after hearing.”
Heath v. Maine Pub. Serv. Co., 210 A.2d 701 (Me. 1965). “1954 (35 M.R.S.A. §§ 2301 and 2302). These statutory provisions apply only to regulated public utilities, not to cooperatives.”
Standish Tel. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 499 A.2d 458 (Me. 1985). “Saco River asked that, pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. §§ 2301 and 2302 (Supp.1984), respectively, the Commission authorize Communications Design to act as a telephone company and grant to it, as an authorized telephone company, a certificate of public convenience and necessity allowing…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.